From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rusty Russell Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/18] Netfilter: Multiport revision with port ranges (replaces "mport") Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 13:24:11 +1100 Message-ID: <1105323851.22093.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1104896159.20582.79.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050105043027.GA23546@linuxace.com> <1104904015.20582.91.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050108020322.GA11903@linuxace.com> <20050108034205.GK8756@eychenne.org> <41E1B162.2010104@eurodev.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Harald Welte , Netfilter development mailing list , Herve Eychenne Return-path: To: Pablo Neira In-Reply-To: <41E1B162.2010104@eurodev.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2005-01-09 at 23:34 +0100, Pablo Neira wrote: > bonjour, > > Herve Eychenne wrote: > > >>(note: didn't update manpage, but then again, wasn't updated with previous > >>changes) > >> > >> > > > >Maybe because no one stated what the manpage policy regarding the > >new revision system would be?... > >When adding every successive revision documentation of every > >match/target to the manpage, wouldn't it become severly bloated in the > >end? You should add the new feature to the manpage. The extension should then fail with an appropriate message if the version of the kernel does not support the option used. eg. libipt_MARK.c's "parse_v0" accepts --and-mark (introduced in rev1) like so: case '2': exit_error(PARAMETER_PROBLEM, "MARK target: kernel too old for --and-mark"); Cheers, Rusty. -- A bad analogy is like a leaky screwdriver -- Richard Braakman