From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.humboldt.co.uk (mail.humboldt.co.uk [81.2.65.18]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE4C62BDF2 for ; Sat, 15 Jan 2005 05:53:04 +1100 (EST) From: Adrian Cox To: Kumar Gala In-Reply-To: <8A6296CC-65A9-11D9-B612-000393DBC2E8@freescale.com> References: <8A6296CC-65A9-11D9-B612-000393DBC2E8@freescale.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 18:06:02 +0000 Message-Id: <1105725962.28030.75.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Scott Hall , Embedded PPC Linux list Subject: Re: mpc-i2c.c in 2.6 List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 15:24 -0600, Kumar Gala wrote: > I was wondering if you had any opinions on the timeout between > transactions in drivers/i2c/busses/mpc-i2c. Looking at it, we > currently set the timeout between transactions to 1 second (HZ). Any > reason its this high? It only exists because when I started the driver I hadn't spotted the timeout field in i2c_adapter. Your patch is fine. -- Adrian Cox