From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
To: Patrick Mansfield <patmans@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Vasquez <andrew.vasquez@qlogic.com>,
SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Mid-layer handling of NOT_READY conditions...
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 19:40:29 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1107049229.4535.38.camel@mulgrave> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050129193421.GA7573@us.ibm.com>
On Sat, 2005-01-29 at 11:34 -0800, Patrick Mansfield wrote:
> But the transport hit a failure, not the storage device.
>
> I thought Andrew hit this sequence:
>
> - pull / replace cable
>
> - IO resumes but gets NOT_READY (the device could be logging back
> into the fibre or such)
>
> - a FC transport problem is hit, DID_BUSY_BUSY is returned, but
> scmd->retries has already been exhausted by the NOT_READY
>
> Did I misread something?
Erm, not sure. Perhaps I'm confused. I thought it was the *device*
that had responded NOT_READY. Obviously, if it's the driver
manufacturing NOT_READY sense because of some transport condition, then
it needs to be correctly reported as a DID_...
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-30 1:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-28 23:24 Mid-layer handling of NOT_READY conditions Andrew Vasquez
2005-01-29 5:46 ` Andrew Vasquez
2005-01-29 16:16 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-01-29 16:44 ` James Bottomley
2005-01-29 19:34 ` Patrick Mansfield
2005-01-30 1:40 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2005-01-30 2:33 ` Douglas Gilbert
2005-01-31 7:47 ` Andrew Vasquez
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-01-31 9:46 Mid-Layer handling of NOT READY conditions EXT / DEVOTEAM VAROQUI Christophe
2005-01-31 14:07 goggin, edward
2005-01-31 16:56 Mid-layer handling of NOT_READY conditions James.Smart
2005-01-31 17:36 ` Patrick Mansfield
2005-02-01 7:21 ` Andrew Vasquez
2005-01-31 18:22 ` Andrew Vasquez
2005-01-31 19:07 James.Smart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1107049229.4535.38.camel@mulgrave \
--to=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=andrew.vasquez@qlogic.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patmans@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.