Re: [PATCH, UDEV] fix permission inconsistency in relation to

[Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>]

On Sat, 2005-02-05 at 16:09 +0100, Michael Buesch wrote:
> Quoting Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>:
> > On Sat, 2005-02-05 at 15:33 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > > On Feb 05, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Should we change that now, so that permissions are applied from a
> > > > symlink-only rule too?
> > > Yes!
> > > I think it's the sensible semantic: the second rule adds a new SYMLINK
> > > *and* sets the permissions of the node, which are two distinct
> > > operations applied by the same rule.
> > 
> > Yeah, we should do that now.
> > 
> > > Unless you think it's broken, I will add the patch to the debian package
> > > of 051 (almost ready).
> > 
> > I think we can make it even simpler, by applying the permission
> > unconditionally, right?
> 
> Yes, seems correct.
> A first test showed that this works.

I've applied it to my tree, thanks.

> PS: Please CC: me on this topic, as I'm not subscribed to the mailing list.
> Thanks.

Sorry, you slipped it the To:.
Didn't you get message directly?

Thanks,
Kay



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
_______________________________________________
Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list  http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net
Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel