From: Fruhwirth Clemens <clemens@endorphin.org>
To: James Morris <jmorris@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, michal@logix.cz,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Adam J. Richter" <adam@yggdrasil.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/04] Adding cipher mode context information to crypto_tfm
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 02:02:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1107997358.7645.24.camel@ghanima> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Xine.LNX.4.44.0502091859540.6222-100000@thoron.boston.redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1997 bytes --]
On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 19:30 -0500, James Morris wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Feb 2005, Fruhwirth Clemens wrote:
>
> > I can't code for the case of two. Because, first, that's the idea of
> > generic in the name "generic scatterwalk", second, I need at least 3
> > scatterlists in parallel for LRW.
>
> Can you explain why you need a third scatterlist for the LRW tweak?
Because a tweak is different from an IV. There can be an arbitrary
number of tweaks. For instance, EME takes 1 tweak per 512 bytes. If you
have a 4k page to encrypt, you have to process 8 tweaks of whatever
size.
Therefore, you need 3 scatterlists: src, dst and the running along
tweak.
However, I don't want to limit the discussion to the specific needs of
LRW or EME. I wanted to write something nice and generic for other
people to use, thus scatterwalk_walk.
There must be a solution to get an arbitrary number of kmappings in
softirq problem. If it's possible for 2 pages, I can't see a reason why
this ain't possible for more. The use of scratch buffers and constant
switching of kmap_atomic mapping is just ridiculously stupid.
> My understanding is that the tweak value is calculated from the disk
> position of the plaintext block and and the secondary key.
That's only partially correct. The tweak value _is_ the location on
disk. The value which is XORed twice is computed from the tweak and the
secondary key. In LRW, you need a tweak value per block. So, if you
encode 256 blocks, you need 256 tweaks. That's what the additional
scatterlist is for.
> It would be useful to see the original patch (which seems to be
> unavailable now), with dm-crypt integration, to see how the entire
> mechanism works beyond the test vectors.
Frankly, I don't see a point escalating this discussion. It must be
possible to process more than 2 mappings in softirq context. If not, I
feel emotionally offended.
--
Fruhwirth Clemens <clemens@endorphin.org> http://clemens.endorphin.org
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-10 1:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-24 11:56 [PATCH 01/04] Adding cipher mode context information to crypto_tfm Fruhwirth Clemens
2005-01-24 12:31 ` James Morris
2005-01-24 22:31 ` Andrew Morton
2005-01-24 23:12 ` Fruhwirth Clemens
2005-01-25 15:52 ` James Morris
2005-01-25 17:38 ` Fruhwirth Clemens
2005-01-25 18:56 ` James Morris
2005-01-29 18:13 ` Fruhwirth Clemens
2005-01-29 18:23 ` Andrew Morton
2005-01-30 18:07 ` Fruhwirth Clemens
2005-02-02 22:46 ` James Morris
2005-02-02 23:28 ` Fruhwirth Clemens
2005-02-02 23:34 ` David S. Miller
2005-02-03 0:21 ` Fruhwirth Clemens
2005-02-03 0:29 ` David S. Miller
2005-02-03 0:40 ` Michal Ludvig
2005-02-03 8:55 ` Fruhwirth Clemens
2005-02-02 23:46 ` James Morris
2005-02-02 23:47 ` James Morris
2005-02-03 11:47 ` Fruhwirth Clemens
2005-02-08 14:14 ` James Morris
2005-02-05 9:23 ` Fruhwirth Clemens
2005-02-08 14:48 ` James Morris
2005-02-08 16:08 ` Fruhwirth Clemens
2005-02-08 16:39 ` Fruhwirth Clemens
2005-02-08 23:30 ` James Morris
2005-02-08 23:53 ` Fruhwirth Clemens
2005-02-09 0:09 ` James Morris
2005-02-09 9:14 ` Fruhwirth Clemens
2005-02-10 0:30 ` James Morris
2005-02-10 1:02 ` Fruhwirth Clemens [this message]
2005-02-10 1:19 ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-10 1:37 ` Christophe Saout
2005-02-10 9:48 ` Fruhwirth Clemens
2005-02-10 10:33 ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-10 11:17 ` Fruhwirth Clemens
2005-02-10 17:02 ` James Morris
2005-02-10 17:29 ` Fruhwirth Clemens
2005-02-10 17:54 ` James Morris
2005-02-14 13:20 ` Fruhwirth Clemens
2005-02-14 15:56 ` David S. Miller
2005-02-14 17:06 ` Fruhwirth Clemens
2005-02-14 17:07 ` David S. Miller
2005-02-14 17:28 ` Fruhwirth Clemens
2005-02-14 18:16 ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-22 19:16 ` Fruhwirth Clemens
2005-02-12 0:24 ` Matt Mackall
2005-02-10 20:30 ` David S. Miller
2005-02-10 1:42 ` James Morris
2005-02-10 9:50 ` Fruhwirth Clemens
2005-02-02 23:00 ` James Morris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1107997358.7645.24.camel@ghanima \
--to=clemens@endorphin.org \
--cc=adam@yggdrasil.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jmorris@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal@logix.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.