From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [Bluez-users] position of multiple bluetooth dongles From: Marcel Holtmann To: bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net In-Reply-To: <421042D2.2040905@gmx.ch> References: <420B9635.6020701@gmx.ch> <200502101825.15870.cijoml@volny.cz> <1108057316.15974.93.camel@pegasus> <421042D2.2040905@gmx.ch> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1108409043.7780.12.camel@notepaq> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: bluez-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: bluez-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Reply-To: bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: BlueZ users List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 20:24:03 +0100 Hi Marco, > so it's no problem? no mather of the bluetooth version of the dongle? no > interference, respectively maybe a couple if thousands in a second? ask an expert on the baseband level. > corrected by rfcomm? The error correction is done at the chip level. The ACL link is reliable. > the distance of two dongles doesn't matter? If the distance is bigger, the chip must request more retransmission. You won't see that in any of the BlueZ layers. Regards Marcel ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Bluez-users mailing list Bluez-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-users