From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: cfq: depth 4 reached, tagging now on
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 16:10:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1109106633.31071.20.camel@krustophenia.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050221082044.GW4056@suse.de>
On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 09:20 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 19 2005, Lee Revell wrote:
> > Starting around 2.6.11-rc4 I get this printk during the boot process
> > after kjournald starts, and again if I stress the filesystem.
> >
> > cfq: depth 4 reached, tagging now on
> >
> > Is this printk intentional? I am sure users will wonder about it,
> > especially because (presumably) cfq turns tagging off at some point in
> > between, and doesn't say anything about it.
>
> It is intentional, but could be supressed. But I'm wondering if the
> accounting change introduced a bug - what hardware are you using cfq on
> (ie does it actually do tagged command queueing, is it SCSI?)?
>
Yes, this is an all SCSI system using the aic7xxx driver.
> It's a one-time message. CFQ starts out assuming the drive doesn't do
> TCQ, if the driver depth goes beyond a defined limit (4), it will assume
> that the hardware can do tagged queueing and change its internal
> accounting accordingly. The setting stays that way, it's not a
> transitional state.
>
OK. Then the multiple messages were CFQ enabling TCQ for the different
drives.
Lee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-22 21:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-19 20:59 cfq: depth 4 reached, tagging now on Lee Revell
2005-02-21 8:20 ` Jens Axboe
2005-02-22 21:10 ` Lee Revell [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-03-04 8:52 Chuck Ebbert
2005-03-04 9:00 ` Jens Axboe
2005-03-04 20:33 ` Lee Revell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1109106633.31071.20.camel@krustophenia.net \
--to=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.