From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
To: jamesclv@us.ibm.com
Cc: keith <kmannth@us.ibm.com>, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
matt dobson <colpatch@us.ibm.com>,
"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] SRAT cleanup: make calculations and indenting level more sane
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:24:11 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1109355851.6921.1.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200502241456.14048.jamesclv@us.ibm.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 151 bytes --]
Keith, James,
How about this one? I think it handles non-sequential entries, and it
uses node_has_online_mem() instead of open-coding it.
-- Dave
[-- Attachment #2: A3.3-srat-cleanup.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 3685 bytes --]
Using the assumption that all addresses in the SRAT are ascending,
the calculations can get a bit simpler, and remove the
"been_here_before" variable.
This also breaks that calculation out into its own function, which
further simplifies the look of the code.
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
---
sparse-dave/arch/i386/kernel/srat.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff -puN arch/i386/kernel/srat.c~A3.3-srat-cleanup arch/i386/kernel/srat.c
--- sparse/arch/i386/kernel/srat.c~A3.3-srat-cleanup 2005-02-25 10:18:19.000000000 -0800
+++ sparse-dave/arch/i386/kernel/srat.c 2005-02-25 10:18:26.000000000 -0800
@@ -181,6 +181,38 @@ static __init void chunk_to_zones(unsign
}
}
+/*
+ * The SRAT table always lists ascending addresses, so can always
+ * assume that the first "start" address that you see is the real
+ * start of the node, and that the current "end" address is after
+ * the previous one.
+ */
+static __init void node_read_chunk(int nid, struct node_memory_chunk_s *memory_chunk)
+{
+ /*
+ * Only add present memory as told by the e820.
+ * There is no guarantee from the SRAT that the memory it
+ * enumerates is present at boot time because it represents
+ * *possible* memory hotplug areas the same as normal RAM.
+ */
+ if (memory_chunk->start_pfn >= max_pfn) {
+ printk (KERN_INFO "Ignoring SRAT pfns: 0x%08lx -> %08lx\n",
+ memory_chunk->start_pfn, memory_chunk->end_pfn);
+ return;
+ }
+ if (memory_chunk->nid != nid)
+ return;
+
+ if (!node_has_online_mem(nid))
+ node_start_pfn[nid] = memory_chunk->start_pfn;
+
+ if (node_start_pfn[nid] > memory_chunk->start_pfn)
+ node_start_pfn[nid] = memory_chunk->start_pfn;
+
+ if (node_end_pfn[nid] < memory_chunk->end_pfn)
+ node_end_pfn[nid] = memory_chunk->end_pfn;
+}
+
/* Parse the ACPI Static Resource Affinity Table */
static int __init acpi20_parse_srat(struct acpi_table_srat *sratp)
{
@@ -261,41 +293,12 @@ static int __init acpi20_parse_srat(stru
printk("Number of memory chunks in system = %d\n", num_memory_chunks);
for (j = 0; j < num_memory_chunks; j++){
+ struct node_memory_chunk_s * chunk = &node_memory_chunk[j];
printk("chunk %d nid %d start_pfn %08lx end_pfn %08lx\n",
- j, node_memory_chunk[j].nid,
- node_memory_chunk[j].start_pfn,
- node_memory_chunk[j].end_pfn);
+ j, chunk->nid, chunk->start_pfn, chunk->end_pfn);
+ node_read_chunk(chunk->nid, chunk);
}
- /*calculate node_start_pfn/node_end_pfn arrays*/
- for_each_online_node(nid) {
- int been_here_before = 0;
-
- for (j = 0; j < num_memory_chunks; j++){
- /*
- * Only add present memroy to node_end/start_pfn
- * There is no guarantee from the srat that the memory
- * is present at boot time.
- */
- if (node_memory_chunk[j].start_pfn >= max_pfn) {
- printk (KERN_INFO "Ignoring chunk of memory reported in the SRAT (could be hot-add zone?)\n");
- printk (KERN_INFO "chunk is reported from pfn %04x to %04x\n",
- node_memory_chunk[j].start_pfn, node_memory_chunk[j].end_pfn);
- continue;
- }
- if (node_memory_chunk[j].nid == nid) {
- if (been_here_before == 0) {
- node_start_pfn[nid] = node_memory_chunk[j].start_pfn;
- node_end_pfn[nid] = node_memory_chunk[j].end_pfn;
- been_here_before = 1;
- } else { /* We've found another chunk of memory for the node */
- if (node_start_pfn[nid] < node_memory_chunk[j].start_pfn) {
- node_end_pfn[nid] = node_memory_chunk[j].end_pfn;
- }
- }
- }
- }
- }
for_each_online_node(nid) {
unsigned long start = node_start_pfn[nid];
unsigned long end = node_end_pfn[nid];
_
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-25 18:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-24 17:29 [PATCH 5/5] SRAT cleanup: make calculations and indenting level more sane Dave Hansen
2005-02-24 19:30 ` keith
2005-02-24 19:54 ` Dave Hansen
2005-02-24 20:49 ` James Cleverdon
2005-02-24 22:02 ` keith
2005-02-24 22:56 ` James Cleverdon
2005-02-25 18:24 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-02-28 18:54 Dave Hansen
2005-02-28 18:54 ` Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1109355851.6921.1.camel@localhost \
--to=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=apw@shadowen.org \
--cc=colpatch@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jamesclv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=kmannth@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.