From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 213-239-205-147.clients.your-server.de ([213.239.205.147] helo=mail.tglx.de) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1D6noZ-0006ud-1s for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 05:44:19 -0500 From: Thomas Gleixner To: David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: <1109845739.16158.14.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> References: <1109841282.5398.30.camel@tglx.tec.linutronix.de> <1109845739.16158.14.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 11:44:16 +0100 Message-Id: <1109846656.4370.20.camel@tglx.tec.linutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: MTD List Subject: Re: [RFD] Move 2.4 code out from CVS head Reply-To: tglx@linutronix.de List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 10:28 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 10:14 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > I strongly vote to branch of a mtd-2.4-latest-devel in CVS from said > > point and then remove the whole 2.4 crap from CVS head. > > Nah. There's already a 2.4 branch. If someone wants to keep -HEAD > working on 2.4, that's OK, but I don't want a new branch for it. I had no intention to keep that branch alive. I just wanted to preserve the current state. Sure we also can release a final MTD-2.4-not- guaranteed-to-work-2005-03-01-10:00-tarball. > If nobody keeps it working, just remove the 2.4-specific files. If nobody objects within 24 hours, I will do so. tglx