From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 213-239-205-147.clients.your-server.de ([213.239.205.147] helo=mail.tglx.de) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1D6ofM-0000A3-Rg for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 06:38:53 -0500 From: Thomas Gleixner To: Steven Scholz In-Reply-To: <4226F51A.7070603@imc-berlin.de> References: <1109841282.5398.30.camel@tglx.tec.linutronix.de> <1109845739.16158.14.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> <1109846656.4370.20.camel@tglx.tec.linutronix.de> <1109846792.16158.20.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> <1109847189.4370.27.camel@tglx.tec.linutronix.de> <1109847630.16158.22.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> <4226F51A.7070603@imc-berlin.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 12:38:50 +0100 Message-Id: <1109849930.4370.45.camel@tglx.tec.linutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: MTD List Subject: Re: [RFD] Move 2.4 code out from CVS head Reply-To: tglx@linutronix.de List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 12:29 +0100, Steven Scholz wrote: > Does that mean that there will be _no_ " maintainence only mode" for 2.4? > > It's ok ig there are no new features for 2.4. But bugs should still be fixed... > > If there already is a 2.4 branch, then this could be used for that. The existing 2.4 branch is the stuff, which is in 2.4 tglx