From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Woodhouse To: Nicolas Pitre In-Reply-To: References: <1109841282.5398.30.camel@tglx.tec.linutronix.de> <1109845739.16158.14.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> <1109846656.4370.20.camel@tglx.tec.linutronix.de> <1109846792.16158.20.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> <1109847189.4370.27.camel@tglx.tec.linutronix.de> <1109847630.16158.22.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> <4226F51A.7070603@imc-berlin.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 18:20:08 +0000 Message-Id: <1109874008.29792.92.camel@baythorne.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: MTD List , Steven Scholz Subject: Re: [RFD] Move 2.4 code out from CVS head List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 11:48 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > Does that mean that there will be _no_ " maintainence only mode" for > > 2.4? > > Depends if _you_ or someone else decides to volunteer for the task. > do you? I don't. I _am_ maintaining JFFS2 in the 2.4 kernel, even to the extent of backporting the __wait_on_freeing_inode() stuff from 2.6 to fix the problems with simultaneous read_inode() and clear_inode(). But I'm not adding new features, so NAND flash isn't supported in 2.4. -- dwmw2