From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>,
SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH scsi-misc-2.6 08/08] scsi: fix hot unplug sequence
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 23:02:45 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1111726965.5612.62.camel@mulgrave> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050325031511.GA22114@htj.dyndns.org>
On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 12:15 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> I think I found the cause. Special requests submitted using
> scsi_do_req() never initializes ->end_io(). Normally, SCSI midlayer
> terminates special requests inside the SCSI midlayer without passing
> through the blkdev layer. However, if a device is going away or taken
> offline, blkdev layer gets to terminate special requests and, as
> ->end_io() is never set-up, nothing happens and the completion gets
> lost.
The analysis is exactly correct, well done! I think your patch is a bit
overly complex, though. We can achieve the same effect simply by
executing the completion without changing the rq_status like the patch
below.
Jens, To go back to the original problem, except when I hit the usb-
storage error handling oops, I can plug and unplug to my hearts content
and everything works.
James
===== drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c 1.152 vs edited =====
--- 1.152/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c 2005-03-18 05:33:09 -06:00
+++ edited/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c 2005-03-24 22:59:18 -06:00
@@ -252,6 +252,16 @@
complete(req->waiting);
}
+/* This is the end routine we get to if a command was never attached
+ * to the request. Simply complete the request without changing
+ * rq_status; this will cause a DRIVER_ERROR. */
+static void scsi_wait_req_end_io(struct request *req)
+{
+ BUG_ON(!req->waiting);
+
+ complete(req->waiting);
+}
+
void scsi_wait_req(struct scsi_request *sreq, const void *cmnd, void *buffer,
unsigned bufflen, int timeout, int retries)
{
@@ -259,6 +269,7 @@
sreq->sr_request->waiting = &wait;
sreq->sr_request->rq_status = RQ_SCSI_BUSY;
+ sreq->sr_request->end_io = scsi_wait_req_end_io;
scsi_do_req(sreq, cmnd, buffer, bufflen, scsi_wait_done,
timeout, retries);
wait_for_completion(&wait);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-25 5:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-23 2:14 [PATCH scsi-misc-2.6 00/08] scsi: small fixes & cleanups Tejun Heo
2005-03-23 2:14 ` [PATCH scsi-misc-2.6 01/08] scsi: remove unused bounce-buffer release path Tejun Heo
2005-03-23 4:07 ` James Bottomley
2005-03-23 6:08 ` Tejun Heo
2005-03-23 15:27 ` Jens Axboe
2005-03-23 2:14 ` [PATCH scsi-misc-2.6 02/08] scsi: don't use blk_insert_request() for requeueing Tejun Heo
2005-03-23 2:14 ` [PATCH scsi-misc-2.6 03/08] scsi: remove unused scsi_cmnd->internal_timeout field Tejun Heo
2005-03-23 2:14 ` [PATCH scsi-misc-2.6 04/08] scsi: remove meaningless volatile qualifiers from structure definitions Tejun Heo
2005-03-23 4:15 ` James Bottomley
2005-03-23 4:22 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-23 5:28 ` Tejun Heo
2005-03-23 15:16 ` James Bottomley
2005-03-23 2:14 ` [PATCH scsi-misc-2.6 05/08] scsi: remove a timer race from scsi_queue_insert() and cleanup timer Tejun Heo
2005-03-23 2:14 ` [PATCH scsi-misc-2.6 06/08] scsi: remove meaningless scsi_cmnd->serial_number_at_timeout field Tejun Heo
2005-03-23 2:14 ` [PATCH scsi-misc-2.6 07/08] scsi: remove bogus {get|put}_device() calls Tejun Heo
2005-03-23 4:15 ` James Bottomley
2005-03-23 9:13 ` Tejun Heo
2005-03-29 17:02 ` Patrick Mansfield
2005-03-23 2:14 ` [PATCH scsi-misc-2.6 08/08] scsi: fix hot unplug sequence Tejun Heo
2005-03-23 4:08 ` James Bottomley
2005-03-23 4:50 ` Tejun Heo
2005-03-23 7:19 ` Jens Axboe
2005-03-23 15:20 ` James Bottomley
2005-03-23 15:25 ` Jens Axboe
2005-03-25 0:45 ` James Bottomley
2005-03-25 3:15 ` Tejun Heo
2005-03-25 5:02 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2005-03-25 5:38 ` Tejun Heo
2005-03-25 19:19 ` James Bottomley
2005-03-25 21:43 ` Tejun Heo
2005-03-25 22:49 ` James Bottomley
2005-03-26 7:27 ` Kai Makisara
2005-03-26 14:48 ` James Bottomley
2005-03-23 15:12 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1111726965.5612.62.camel@mulgrave \
--to=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.