From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.11, IDE: Strange scheduling behaviour: high-pri RT process
	not scheduled?
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 15:37:58 -0500
Message-ID: <1112215078.17365.11.camel@mindpipe>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0503300931350.7542-100000@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from viper.oldcity.dca.net ([216.158.38.4]:50886 "HELO
	viper.oldcity.dca.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP
	id S261175AbVC3UiA (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 30 Mar 2005 15:38:00 -0500
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0503300931350.7542-100000@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca>
Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
To: Mark Hahn <hahn@physics.mcmaster.ca>
Cc: kus Kusche Klaus <kus@keba.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 09:41 -0500, Mark Hahn wrote:
> >> The test system runs a 2.6.11 kernel (no SMP) on a Pentium3 500 MHz 
> > embedded hardware.
> 
> which probably has memory bandwidth of at most a couple hundred MB/s,
> which is really horrible by modern standards.

What does that have to do with anything?  He said it was an embedded
system.

Lee