From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NFS client latencies
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 21:47:19 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1112237239.26732.8.camel@mindpipe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050330183957.2468dc21.akpm@osdl.org>
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 18:39 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Yes. Together with the radix tree-based sorting of dirty requests,
> > > that's pretty much what I've spent most of today doing. Lee, could you
> > > see how the attached combined patch changes your latency numbers?
> > >
> >
> > Different code path, and the latency is worse. See the attached ~7ms
> > trace.
>
> Is a bunch of gobbledygook. Hows about you interpret it for us?
>
Sorry. When I summarized them before, Ingo just asked for the full
verbose trace.
The 7 ms are spent in this loop:
radix_tree_tag_clear+0xe/0xd0 <c01e040e> (nfs_scan_lock_dirty+0xb2/0xf0 <c01c3a22>)
nfs_set_page_writeback_locked+0xe/0x60 <c01c357e> (nfs_scan_lock_dirty+0x8d/0xf0 <c01c39fd>)
radix_tree_tag_set+0xe/0xa0 <c01e036e> (nfs_set_page_writeback_locked+0x4b/0x60 <c01c35bb>)
radix_tree_tag_clear+0xe/0xd0 <c01e040e> (nfs_scan_lock_dirty+0xb2/0xf0 <c01c3a22>)
nfs_set_page_writeback_locked+0xe/0x60 <c01c357e> (nfs_scan_lock_dirty+0x8d/0xf0 <c01c39fd>)
radix_tree_tag_set+0xe/0xa0 <c01e036e> (nfs_set_page_writeback_locked+0x4b/0x60 <c01c35bb>)
radix_tree_tag_clear+0xe/0xd0 <c01e040e> (nfs_scan_lock_dirty+0xb2/0xf0 <c01c3a22>)
nfs_set_page_writeback_locked+0xe/0x60 <c01c357e> (nfs_scan_lock_dirty+0x8d/0xf0 <c01c39fd>)
radix_tree_tag_set+0xe/0xa0 <c01e036e> (nfs_set_page_writeback_locked+0x4b/0x60 <c01c35bb>)
radix_tree_tag_clear+0xe/0xd0 <c01e040e> (nfs_scan_lock_dirty+0xb2/0xf0 <c01c3a22>)
nfs_set_page_writeback_locked+0xe/0x60 <c01c357e> (nfs_scan_lock_dirty+0x8d/0xf0 <c01c39fd>)
radix_tree_tag_set+0xe/0xa0 <c01e036e> (nfs_set_page_writeback_locked+0x4b/0x60 <c01c35bb>)
radix_tree_tag_clear+0xe/0xd0 <c01e040e> (nfs_scan_lock_dirty+0xb2/0xf0 <c01c3a22>)
nfs_set_page_writeback_locked+0xe/0x60 <c01c357e> (nfs_scan_lock_dirty+0x8d/0xf0 <c01c39fd>)
radix_tree_tag_set+0xe/0xa0 <c01e036e> (nfs_set_page_writeback_locked+0x4b/0x60 <c01c35bb>)
radix_tree_tag_clear+0xe/0xd0 <c01e040e> (nfs_scan_lock_dirty+0xb2/0xf0 <c01c3a22>)
radix_tree_gang_lookup_tag+0xe/0x80 <c01e074e> (nfs_scan_lock_dirty+0x69/0xf0 <c01c39d9>)
__lookup_tag+0xe/0x130 <c01e061e> (radix_tree_gang_lookup_tag+0x59/0x80 <c01e0799>)
Lee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-31 2:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-29 23:04 NFS client latencies Lee Revell
2005-03-29 23:18 ` Trond Myklebust
2005-03-29 23:32 ` Lee Revell
2005-03-29 23:34 ` Trond Myklebust
2005-03-29 23:37 ` Lee Revell
2005-03-30 8:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-30 14:11 ` Trond Myklebust
2005-03-30 14:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-30 19:53 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-30 14:26 ` Lee Revell
2005-03-30 14:50 ` Trond Myklebust
2005-03-30 19:50 ` Lee Revell
2005-03-30 19:56 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-30 21:14 ` Trond Myklebust
2005-03-31 2:26 ` Lee Revell
2005-03-31 2:39 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-31 2:47 ` Lee Revell [this message]
2005-03-31 3:48 ` Trond Myklebust
2005-03-31 6:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-31 7:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-31 7:18 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-31 7:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-31 11:58 ` Trond Myklebust
2005-03-31 12:34 ` Trond Myklebust
2005-03-31 13:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-31 14:32 ` Trond Myklebust
2005-03-31 14:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-31 14:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-01 2:28 ` Lee Revell
2005-04-01 4:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-01 16:16 ` Orion Poplawski
2005-04-01 16:33 ` Trond Myklebust
2005-04-01 21:18 ` Lee Revell
2005-03-31 14:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-31 15:00 ` Trond Myklebust
2005-03-31 14:54 ` Trond Myklebust
2005-03-31 14:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-31 15:06 ` Trond Myklebust
2005-03-31 15:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-31 16:00 ` Trond Myklebust
2005-03-31 15:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-31 7:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-31 7:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-31 7:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-03-31 7:58 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1112237239.26732.8.camel@mindpipe \
--to=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.