All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, guillaume.thouvenin@bull.net,
	jlan@engr.sgi.com, efocht@hpce.nec.com, linuxram@us.ibm.com,
	gh@us.ibm.com, elsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, greg@kroah.com
Subject: Re: [1/1] CBUS: new very fast (for insert operations) message bus based on kenel connector.
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 10:43:34 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1112337814.9334.42.camel@uganda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050331162758.44aeaf44.akpm@osdl.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4309 bytes --]

On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 16:27 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru> wrote:
> >
> > I'm pleased to annouce CBUS - ultra fast (for insert operations)
> > message bus.
> 
> > +static int cbus_enqueue(struct cbus_event_container *c, struct cn_msg *msg)
> > +{
> > +	int err;
> > +	struct cbus_event *event;
> > +	unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > +	event = kmalloc(sizeof(*event) + msg->len, GFP_ATOMIC);
> 
> Using GFP_ATOMIC is a bit lame.  It would be better to require the caller
> to pass in the gfp_flags.  Or simply require that all callers not hold
> locks and use GFP_KERNEL.

New API with GFP flags provided is a next step in connector's TODO list.

> > +static int cbus_process(struct cbus_event_container *c, int all)
> > +{
> > +	struct cbus_event *event;
> > +	int len, i, num;
> > +	
> > +	if (list_empty(&c->event_list))
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	if (all)
> > +		len = c->qlen;
> > +	else
> > +		len = 1;
> > +
> > +	num = 0;
> > +	for (i=0; i<len; ++i) {
> > +		event = cbus_dequeue(c);
> > +		if (!event)
> > +			continue;
> > +
> > +		cn_netlink_send(&event->msg, 0);
> > +		num++;
> > +
> > +		kfree(event);
> > +	}
> > +	
> > +	return num;
> > +}
> 
> It might be cleaner to pass in an item count rather than a boolean `all'
> here.  Then again, it seems racy.

It was called somehow like
we_are_at_the_end_and_must_process_all_events_remain, 
so cbus_process() could be called from the ->exit() routing.
So I decided to call it that way, but I'm not so impracticabile about
it.

> The initial list_empty() call could fail to detect new events due to lack
> of locking and memory barriers.

It is perfectly normal, and locking does not exist here for performance
reasons.
cbus_process() is too low priority in comparison with insert operation,
so it can easily miss one entry and process it next time.

> We conventionally code for loops as
> 
> 	for (i = 0; i < len; i++)

Grrr....

> > +static int cbus_event_thread(void *data)
> > +{
> > +	int i, non_empty = 0, empty = 0;
> > +	struct cbus_event_container *c;
> > +
> > +	daemonize(cbus_name);
> > +	allow_signal(SIGTERM);
> > +	set_user_nice(current, 19);
> 
> Please use the kthread api for managing this thread.
> 
> Is a new kernel thread needed?

Logic behind cbus is following: 
1. make insert operation return as soon as possible,
2. deferring actual message delivering to the safe time

That thread does second point.

> > +	while (!cbus_need_exit) {
> > +		if (empty || non_empty == 0 || non_empty > 10) {
> > +			interruptible_sleep_on_timeout(&cbus_wait_queue, 10);
> 
> interruptible_sleep_on_timeout() is heavily deprecated and is racy without
> external locking (it pretty much has to be the BKL).  Use wait_event_timeout().

Ok.

> > +int __devinit cbus_init(void)
> > +{
> > +	int i, err = 0;
> > +	struct cbus_event_container *c;
> > +	
> > +	for_each_cpu(i) {
> > +		c = &per_cpu(cbus_event_list, i);
> > +		cbus_init_event_container(c);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	init_completion(&cbus_thread_exited);
> > +
> > +	cbus_pid = kernel_thread(cbus_event_thread, NULL, CLONE_FS | CLONE_FILES);
> 
> Using the kthread API would clean this up.
> 
> > +	if (IS_ERR((void *)cbus_pid)) {
> 
> The weird cast here might not even work at all on 64-bit architectures.  It
> depends if they sign extend ints when casting them to pointers.  I guess
> they do.  If cbus_pid is indeed an s32.
> 
> Much better to do
> 
> 	if (cbus_pid < 0)

I will do it after above issues resolved.

> > +void __devexit cbus_fini(void)
> > +{
> > +	int i;
> > +	struct cbus_event_container *c;
> > +
> > +	cbus_need_exit = 1;
> > +	kill_proc(cbus_pid, SIGTERM, 0);
> > +	wait_for_completion(&cbus_thread_exited);
> > +	
> > +	for_each_cpu(i) {
> > +		c = &per_cpu(cbus_event_list, i);
> > +		cbus_fini_event_container(c);
> > +	}
> > +}
> 
> I think this is racy.  What stops new events from being queued while this
> function is in progress?

cbus_insert() should check need_exit flag - patch exists, 
but against my tree, so I wait untill CBUS showed in public,
so I can resync with it.

-- 
        Evgeniy Polyakov

Crash is better than data corruption -- Arthur Grabowski

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2005-04-01  6:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-20  8:23 [1/1] CBUS: new very fast (for insert operations) message bus based on kenel connector Evgeniy Polyakov
2005-04-01  0:27 ` Andrew Morton
2005-04-01  6:43   ` Evgeniy Polyakov [this message]
2005-04-01  7:26     ` Andrew Morton
2005-04-01  7:45       ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2005-04-01  7:59         ` Andrew Morton
2005-04-01  8:50           ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2005-04-01  9:25             ` Andrew Morton
2005-04-01 10:16               ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2005-04-01 10:30                 ` Andrew Morton
2005-04-01 10:55                   ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2005-04-01 11:20                     ` Andrew Morton
2005-04-01 13:12                       ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2005-04-01 19:11                         ` Andrew Morton
2005-04-02 15:22                           ` Evgeniy Polyakov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1112337814.9334.42.camel@uganda \
    --to=johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=efocht@hpce.nec.com \
    --cc=elsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=gh@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=guillaume.thouvenin@bull.net \
    --cc=jlan@engr.sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.