From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: christophe varoqui Subject: Re: multipathd.init Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 21:59:13 +0200 Message-ID: <1112558353.8118.67.camel@zezette> References: <20050401204048.GI14307@agk.surrey.redhat.com> <1112389744.8118.26.camel@zezette> <20050401211902.GL14307@agk.surrey.redhat.com> <1112390705.8118.34.camel@zezette> <1112521418.8118.49.camel@zezette> Reply-To: device-mapper development Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1112521418.8118.49.camel@zezette> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com To: device-mapper development List-Id: dm-devel.ids > > What needs to be done to have libdevmapper and libsysfs packages include > their respective klibc build version ? What about klibc shared objects > vs static ? > As a kick-off, here is a little clean up patch. I guess it's harmless anyway. diff -ur devmapper-1.01.00/lib/libdm-file.c devmapper-1.01.00.klibcbuild/lib/libdm-file.c --- devmapper-1.01.00/lib/libdm-file.c 2005-01-06 19:22:44.000000000 +0100 +++ devmapper-1.01.00.klibcbuild/lib/libdm-file.c 2005-04-03 21:26:13.000000000 +0200 @@ -16,7 +16,6 @@ #include "lib.h" #include "libdm-file.h" -#include #include #include #include -- christophe varoqui