From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Bhupesh SHARMA <bhupesh.sharma@st.com>
Cc: "linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-media@vger.kernel.org" <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
"balbi@ti.com" <balbi@ti.com>,
"g.liakhovetski@gmx.de" <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: Using UVC webcam gadget with a real v4l2 device
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:17:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <111268324.hD9BSZaXPY@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D5ECB3C7A6F99444980976A8C6D896384FA44454C7@EAPEX1MAIL1.st.com>
Hi Bhupesh,
On Monday 23 April 2012 02:24:53 Bhupesh SHARMA wrote:
> Hi Laurent,
>
> I have been doing some experimentation with the UVC webcam gadget along with
> the UVC user-space application which you have written.
>
> The UVC webcam gadget works fine with the user space application handling
> the CONTROL events and providing DATA events. Now, I wish to interface a
> real v4l2 device, for e.g. VIVI or more particularly a soc_camera based
> host and subdev pair.
>
> Now, I see that I can achieve this by opening the UVC and V4L2 devices and
> doing MMAP -> REQBUF -> QBUF -> DQBUF calls on both the devices per the UVC
> control event received. But this will involve copying the video buffer in
> the user-space application from v4l2 (_CAPTURE) to uvc (_OUTPUT) domains,
> which will significantly reduce the video capture performance.
>
> Is there a better solution to this issue? Maybe doing something like a RNDIS
> gadget does with the help of u_ether.c like helper routines. But if I
> remember well it also requires the BRCTL (Bridge Control Utility) in
> userspace to route data arriving on usb0 to eth0 and vice-versa. Not sure
> though, if it does copying of a skb buffer from ethernet to usb domain and
> vice-versa.
To avoid copying data between the two devices you should use USERPTR instead
of MMAP on at least one of the two V4L2 devices. The UVC gadget driver doesn't
support USERPTR yet though. This shouldn't be too difficult to fix, we need to
replace the custom buffers queue implementation with videobuf2, as has been
done in the uvcvideo driver.
I'll try to implement this. Would you then be able to test patches ?
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-23 14:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-22 18:24 Using UVC webcam gadget with a real v4l2 device Bhupesh SHARMA
2012-04-23 14:17 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2012-04-23 18:46 ` Bhupesh SHARMA
2012-04-23 20:55 ` Laurent Pinchart
2012-04-25 15:06 ` Bhupesh SHARMA
2012-04-26 5:23 ` Bhupesh SHARMA
2012-04-30 10:20 ` Laurent Pinchart
2012-04-30 10:47 ` Bhupesh SHARMA
2012-05-02 11:55 ` Laurent Pinchart
2012-04-30 3:34 ` Bhupesh SHARMA
2012-04-24 0:36 ` Peter Chen
2012-04-24 9:04 ` Laurent Pinchart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=111268324.hD9BSZaXPY@avalon \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=bhupesh.sharma@st.com \
--cc=g.liakhovetski@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.