Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [PATCH 3/6] CKRM: Add limit support for mem controller

[Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>]

On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 11:26 -0700, Chandra Seetharaman wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 10:59:02AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 10:42 -0700, Chandra Seetharaman wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 07:10:50AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: 
> > > > What does "impl" stand for, anyway?  implied?  implicit? implemented?
> > > 
> > > I meant implicit... you can also say implied.... will add in comments to
> > > the dats structure definition.
> > 
> > How about changing the name of the structure member?  Comments suck.
> 
> you mean explicit name like implicit_guarantee ? if comments suck, IMHO,
> impl_guar is good enough an option for a field that holds implicit
> guarantee.

I think you possibly suffer from an a case of ibmersdontlikevowelsitis
which seems to be endemic to our company.  In case you're wondering,
Linus already found our missing vowels:

	http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0110.1/1294.html

-- Dave

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>