From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anthony Liguori Subject: RE: Bug tracking system Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 16:08:31 -0500 Message-ID: <1113426511.13307.1.camel@localhost> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 15:49, Ian Pratt wrote: > We discussed this a bit at the summit. We have 'trac' set up and ready > to go, but we weren't planning on announcing it until we fork off > 3.0-testing around the end of May/ beginning of June. If there was > strong demand, we'd obviously revist this, but my impression is that the > mailing lists are working effectively and bugs generally get fixed > pretty quickly. (Last week and this have been a bit tough because of the > summit and now Usenix TC) I personally think we need something for the interim. I'm not sure whether we need a full bug database but we at least need something to keep a list of current issues. (Perhaps a page on the wiki?) Regards, > The other issue that was raised was whether we need to go with bugzilla > to be able to integrate in to distro bug databases. We certainly prefer > trac, but if we need the ability to assign bugs between databases, I > guess we'll have to go with bugzilla. > Any views? > > Thanks, > Ian > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel -- Anthony Liguori Linux Technology Center (LTC) - IBM Austin E-mail: aliguori@us.ibm.com Phone: (512) 838-1208