From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752427AbXCZM0O (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Mar 2007 08:26:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752445AbXCZM0N (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Mar 2007 08:26:13 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:50971 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752427AbXCZM0M (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Mar 2007 08:26:12 -0400 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: References: To: Pekka J Enberg Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bryan.wu@analog.com, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Subject: Re: revoke: no revoke for nommu X-Mailer: MH-E 8.0; nmh 1.1; GNU Emacs 22.0.50 Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 13:25:59 +0100 Message-ID: <11139.1174911959@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Pekka J Enberg wrote: > There's just no sane way to revoke shared memory mappings for NOMMU so lets > disable the thing completely when CONFIG_MMU=n. I think that's reasonable for now - we can always add support as far as possible later. David