From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Larson Subject: Re: Xen bugzilla Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 12:16:42 -0500 Message-ID: <1114190202.6127.118.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1114184000.23365.177.camel@plym.cl.cam.ac.uk> <4269210D.2000501@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2138510014==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4269210D.2000501@us.ibm.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Mime-version: 1.0 Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Nivedita Singhvi Cc: James Bulpin , xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org --===============2138510014== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-D1U4UepQYKqkVcQIpsg8" --=-D1U4UepQYKqkVcQIpsg8 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2005-04-22 at 09:06 -0700, Nivedita Singhvi wrote: > James Bulpin wrote: > > Folks, > >=20 > > As requested we now have a bugzilla bug tracker for the Xen project. It > > is available at http://bugzilla.xensource.com/=20 > >=20 > > Registration is required to submit and modify bug reports. We hope to > > support anonymous reports in the near future.=20 > >=20 > > Please let me know of any problems or suggestions, extra components, > > categories, etc. desired. >=20 > Excellent job, guys, much thanks! I logged in and could create an > account in under a 30 seconds, email exchange and all. >=20 > Just a few trivial questions: >=20 > 1. The Component field has the following: First, many THANKS for doing this!!!! I do agree that the components probably need some work, but I'm sure exactly which components to have will become more clear going forward. > 2. The Version field has 2.0, unstable, unspecified. > Do you want -testing as a separate category or in the 2.0 > bucket? Are you going to add the individual releases > 2.0.4, 2.0.5, etc? The finer granularity in the Version > field does make it easier to search - especially once > you have a long history :). That makes a lot of sense to me. Is it going to get confusing as unstable feeds into testing, and testing into stable, which unstable we're talking about when submitting a bug against unstable? Just a thought. --=20 Thanks, Paul Larson plars@linuxtestproject.org http://www.linuxtestproject.org --=-D1U4UepQYKqkVcQIpsg8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCaTF5bkpggQiFDqcRAmQZAJ9Ztza1uUGkVUiKRoo5uSlJt+OCFQCeNyoq pE9TkRTafq/oU3g5hVJShFk= =dkfb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-D1U4UepQYKqkVcQIpsg8-- --===============2138510014== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel --===============2138510014==--