From: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
pavel@ucw.cz, drzeus-list@drzeus.cx,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
pasky@ucw.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.12-rc3
Date: 26 Apr 2005 01:25:58 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1114493158.2937.253.camel@d845pe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050424032622.3aef8c9f.akpm@osdl.org>
On Sun, 2005-04-24 at 06:26, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Andrew has some work to do before he can regain momentum:
>
> - Which subsystem maintainers will have public git trees?
>
> - Which maintainers will continue to use bk?
I will continue to use bk
until an alternative emerges that makes my role
as a sub-system maintainer easier -- rather than harder.
My employer pays for a commercial bk license.
> - Can Andrew legally use the bk client?
>
> - Can Andrew legally use a bk client which won't go phut at cset 65535?
I don't see why not. Given your central role to the Linux development
process, I would think it would be trivial to justify OSDL arming you
with any and all tools you desire if they make you even slightly more effective.
Also, I would think Bitmover would be interested in having you enabled
to keep people like me as happy paying customers.
The question for bk use is what do we do for a reference "Linus tree"
history. It would be most effective if we could have a single bk history
rather than everybody rolling their own.
> - How do I do a bk `gcapatch' is there is no Linus bk tree to base it off?
>
> - If none of the above, which maintainers will put up-to-date raw patches
> in places where Andrew can get at them?
I can do this if you require it. The current "acpi patch" includes
68 patches: 200 files changed, 7780 insertions(+), 5455 deletions(-)
Everything in it is intended to go to Linus on day-one of 2.6.13.
Some of it should really go into 2.6.12 - but frankly, I hesitate
to touch 2.6.12 while the tools are in such flux.
> I don't know how all this will pan out. I guess the next -mm won't have
> many subsystem trees and I'll gradually add them as things get sorted out.
Please do not roll -mm without including the ACPI sub-system.
-mm provides the broadest pre-integration test coverage we've ever had.
It has allowed us to significantly reduce regressions in Linus' tree
as we encounter the inevitable setbacks associated with making
the ACPI sub-system in Linux the best in the industry.
thanks,
-Len
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-26 5:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 91+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-21 0:59 Linux 2.6.12-rc3 Linus Torvalds
2005-04-21 1:09 ` Alejandro Bonilla
2005-04-21 1:26 ` James Purser
2005-04-21 1:38 ` Patrick McFarland
2005-04-21 2:01 ` Alejandro Bonilla
2005-04-21 4:03 ` Barry K. Nathan
2005-04-21 8:17 ` Martin Schlemmer
2005-04-21 8:49 ` Jan Dittmer
2005-04-21 8:59 ` Jan Dittmer
2005-04-21 9:10 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2005-04-21 16:11 ` Al Viro
2005-04-21 17:39 ` Al Viro
2005-04-22 22:18 ` Roman Zippel
2005-05-30 23:48 ` more thread_info patches Roman Zippel
2005-05-30 23:50 ` Roman Zippel
2005-05-30 23:51 ` Roman Zippel
2005-05-31 12:16 ` Vincent Hanquez
2005-05-30 23:52 ` Roman Zippel
2005-05-31 1:25 ` randy_dunlap
2005-05-31 9:35 ` Roman Zippel
2005-05-31 15:37 ` randy_dunlap
2005-04-21 17:45 ` Linux 2.6.12-rc3 Al Viro
2005-04-21 17:57 ` Al Viro
2005-04-21 18:08 ` Al Viro
2005-04-25 19:14 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2005-04-26 3:24 ` Al Viro
2005-04-26 8:21 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2005-04-21 18:04 ` Al Viro
2005-04-25 19:12 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2005-04-21 11:20 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-21 12:03 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-21 16:22 ` Petr Baudis
2005-04-21 19:00 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-21 19:09 ` Petr Baudis
2005-04-21 21:38 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-21 21:41 ` Petr Baudis
2005-04-21 22:30 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-23 21:31 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-21 23:22 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-21 23:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-22 0:21 ` Petr Baudis
2005-04-22 23:18 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-23 0:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-23 11:19 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-23 14:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-23 16:27 ` Pierre Ossman
2005-04-23 22:02 ` Greg KH
2005-04-23 22:29 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-23 23:38 ` Greg KH
2005-04-24 10:26 ` Andrew Morton
2005-04-24 17:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-24 19:06 ` Sam Ravnborg
2005-04-24 19:55 ` Greg KH
2005-04-24 20:17 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-24 20:29 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-24 22:48 ` David S. Miller
2005-04-24 23:17 ` Marcel Holtmann
2005-04-25 7:40 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2005-04-26 5:25 ` Len Brown [this message]
2005-04-26 5:50 ` Andrew Morton
2005-04-23 23:00 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-23 23:06 ` Petr Baudis
2005-04-24 7:21 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-24 7:35 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-04-24 5:45 ` Greg KH
2005-04-23 12:21 ` Ed Tomlinson
2005-04-23 23:23 ` Petr Baudis
2005-04-24 7:25 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-21 12:18 ` Martin Schlemmer
2005-04-22 7:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-04-21 12:19 ` Ralf Hildebrandt
2005-04-21 15:45 ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-04-21 13:33 ` Andreas Steinmetz
2005-04-22 0:31 ` Greg KH
2005-04-21 14:24 ` Linux 2.6.12-rc3: Oops on IDE flash disk eject Andreas Steinmetz
2005-04-21 15:27 ` Andreas Steinmetz
2005-04-21 17:00 ` Linux 2.6.12-rc3: various swsusp problems Andreas Steinmetz
2005-04-21 18:57 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-21 20:02 ` Andreas Steinmetz
2005-04-25 9:50 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-21 20:55 ` Andreas Steinmetz
2005-04-22 15:13 ` Stefan Seyfried
2005-04-23 2:57 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-04-23 8:18 ` Stefan Seyfried
2005-04-23 9:14 ` Pavel Machek
2005-04-21 19:10 ` Linux 2.6.12-rc3 Benoit Boissinot
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-04-22 7:56 Borislav Petkov
2005-04-24 5:42 ` Greg KH
2005-04-24 6:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2005-04-24 7:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
[not found] <3VIcq-8ls-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <3VIFr-px-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <3VMJj-3Hv-61@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <3VThx-16N-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <3VUnf-1Ua-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <3WfL8-33i-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <3WgH8-3LO-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <3WqZS-3qK-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <3WtEl-5Ao-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <3WBVe-3Qn-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <3WIaj-8vN-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-04-24 15:10 ` Bodo Eggert <harvested.in.lkml@posting.7eggert.dyndns.org>
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1114493158.2937.253.camel@d845pe \
--to=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=drzeus-list@drzeus.cx \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lm@bitmover.com \
--cc=pasky@ucw.cz \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.