From: "Michael Chan" <mchan@broadcom.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: shemminger@osdl.org, jgarzik@pobox.com, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Mystery packet killing tg3
Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 14:28:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1115155690.15156.32.camel@rh4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050503150333.1ac1c159.davem@davemloft.net>
On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 15:03 -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> Michael, there were no master/target abort bits set in the PCI status
> register from his dump. If one of the DMA units locks up on the tg3,
> will it still be able to update the PCI_STATUS register appropriately
> when it encounters a DMA transaction error (ie. master or target abort)
I believe so. Also, the DMA read and write status registers showed all
zeros, meaning there were no DMA related errors:
DEBUG: RDMAC_MODE[000003fc] RDMAC_STATUS[00000000]
DEBUG: WDMAC_MODE[000003fc] WDMAC_STATUS[00000000]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-03 21:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-02 23:24 Mystery packet killing tg3 Stephen Hemminger
2005-05-03 3:02 ` David S. Miller
2005-05-03 21:05 ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-05-03 21:13 ` David S. Miller
2005-05-03 20:41 ` Michael Chan
2005-05-03 22:03 ` David S. Miller
2005-05-03 21:28 ` Michael Chan [this message]
2005-05-03 22:53 ` David S. Miller
2005-05-03 22:45 ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-05-03 22:39 ` David S. Miller
2005-05-03 22:59 ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-05-03 21:29 ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-05-04 18:30 ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-04 18:44 ` Peter Buckingham
2005-05-05 11:43 ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-05 16:20 ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-05-05 18:01 ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-05 17:09 ` Peter Buckingham
2005-05-05 17:32 ` Rick Jones
2005-05-05 17:38 ` Peter Buckingham
2005-05-05 17:45 ` John Heffner
2005-05-05 18:06 ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-05 18:21 ` Peter Buckingham
2005-05-05 18:31 ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-05 18:40 ` Peter Buckingham
2005-05-05 18:56 ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-05 19:02 ` Peter Buckingham
2005-05-05 19:24 ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-04 19:41 ` Stephen Hemminger
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-05-04 6:09 Michael Chan
2005-05-04 6:27 Michael Chan
2005-05-04 22:51 ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-05-04 22:30 ` Michael Chan
[not found] ` <20050505113356.0f1b4c00.davem@davemloft.net>
2005-05-05 19:56 ` Michael Chan
2005-05-05 21:42 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1115155690.15156.32.camel@rh4 \
--to=mchan@broadcom.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.