From: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
Cc: Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@data.slu.se>,
Jens.Laas@data.slu.se, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: (diet-)FIB alternative fib_hlist.c
Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 08:49:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1115297370.7680.58.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1zmvax2cx.fsf@muc.de>
On Wed, 2005-04-05 at 20:39 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@data.slu.se> writes:
>
> > Hello!
> >
> > fib_hlist is the smallest and simpliest routing algo we could think of
> > it's just a sorted (h)list.
> >
> > routing (FIB lookup) performance. dst hash is not used.
> >
> > fib_hlist fib_hash test routing table size
> > -----------------------------------------------------
> > 444 kpps 433 kpps Single flow. local=19/main=5 entries
> > 433 kpps 431 kpps rDoS. local=19/main=5
> > 0.2 kpps 198 kpps rDoS local=19/main=123946
> >
> Great patch! I wanted to do something like this for a long time :/
> It is a good solution for 99.999% of all users who never have more
> than a few routes.
>
Great patch it is - but why do you say "99.999% of all users" feel they
would love this? Clearly perfomance at the low routes area is not
something that is a huge difference against standard fib. And you suffer
miserably at latge route size.
Is it memory consumption you are thinking of?
cheers,
jamal
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-05 12:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-04 16:10 (diet-)FIB alternative fib_hlist.c Robert Olsson
2005-05-04 18:39 ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-04 20:10 ` Robert Olsson
2005-05-05 12:49 ` jamal [this message]
2005-05-05 18:07 ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-05 19:54 ` Andre Tomt
2005-05-06 11:31 ` Robert Olsson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1115297370.7680.58.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=Jens.Laas@data.slu.se \
--cc=Robert.Olsson@data.slu.se \
--cc=ak@muc.de \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.