From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marcel Holtmann Subject: Re: IO plugin and multiple poll descriptors Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 14:56:43 +0200 Message-ID: <1116421003.10063.243.camel@pegasus> References: <1116173811.8886.55.camel@pegasus> <1116335015.10063.91.camel@pegasus> <1116417943.10063.234.camel@pegasus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Takashi Iwai Cc: ALSA Mailing List List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Hi Takashi, thanks for the answers. > > What happens at the moment when I really return two poll_fd. What about this one? > > > This change breaks the compatibility with older versions. > > > For the future compatibility, I added a new field to > > > snd_pcm_ioplug_t. > > > > Does it? If the new callbacks are not used you will fall back to poll_fd > > and so no difference at all. > > Well, I inserted in the middle, not at the end. You are right. I always forget to think about binary compatibility ;) > > And you never released a final version with IOPLUG support. > > Yes. I don't care the compatibility *now* at all. > But, as I wrote, this is for *future* compatibility. Once after > 1.0.9-final is out, we should be careful about it. I agree. Regards Marcel ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes Want to be the first software developer in space? Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7412&alloc_id=16344&op=click