From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: omb@bluewin.ch
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: When we detect that a 16550 was in fact part of a NatSemi SuperIO chip
Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 16:31:13 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1116793873.30456.0.camel@mindpipe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4290E466.5040907@khandalf.com>
On Sun, 2005-05-22 at 21:58 +0200, Brian O'Mahoney wrote:
> There is NO Question(TM), the DPA is about the privacy, appropriateness,
> accuracy of private data and the way that data can be used by government
> or industry, and I can see no reason why anyone should remove
> 'sign-offs' or other identification in the original e-mail which forms
> part of the original communication, if legal advice was received to
> the contrary it is _plain_wrong_; (for example we could not store e-mail
> sent to us, which is often mandatory to the proper conduct of business).
>
> Copyright law is complicated, since it differs in the UK, EU and non EU
> contries, such as Switzerland; so in the UK copyright automatically
> persists in anything I write, in the US it dosn't, BUT, if a Bern
> Convention copyright notice is included, eg:
>
Are you a lawyer? I think "copyright automatically persists in anything
you write" in the US as well.
Lee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-22 20:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200505220008.j4M08uE9025378@hera.kernel.org>
2005-05-22 11:57 ` When we detect that a 16550 was in fact part of a NatSemi SuperIO chip David Woodhouse
2005-05-22 12:59 ` Russell King
2005-05-22 13:23 ` David Woodhouse
2005-05-22 13:41 ` Russell King
2005-05-22 14:14 ` David Woodhouse
2005-05-22 21:16 ` Alan Cox
2005-05-22 21:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-05-22 22:22 ` Alan Cox
2005-05-22 22:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-05-22 22:43 ` Alan Cox
2005-05-23 4:09 ` Willy Tarreau
2005-05-23 5:15 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-05-23 7:21 ` Willy Tarreau
2005-05-23 14:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-05-22 16:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-05-22 17:15 ` David Woodhouse
2005-05-22 18:14 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-05-22 18:44 ` Russell King
2005-05-22 18:51 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-05-22 19:03 ` Russell King
2005-05-22 20:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-05-22 20:55 ` Brian O'Mahoney
2005-05-22 19:58 ` Brian O'Mahoney
2005-05-22 20:31 ` Lee Revell [this message]
2005-05-22 20:48 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1116793873.30456.0.camel@mindpipe \
--to=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=omb@bluewin.ch \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.