From: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
To: David Stevens <dlstevens@us.ibm.com>
Cc: "Andy Gospodarek" <andy@greyhouse.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Brian Haley <brian.haley@hp.com>,
bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bonding-devel] [PATCH 3/3] bonding: Improve IGMP join processing
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 15:15:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <11176.1173222941@death> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OF686AF962.8A54116E-ON88257296.007AF408-88257296.007BC448@us.ibm.com>
David Stevens <dlstevens@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>It looks to me like "rejoin" is essentially ip_mc_up(), and it'd be better
>to call that than add a nearly identical function.
Won't ip_mc_up() acquire an additional reference (via
ip_mc_inc_group) to the IGMP_ALL_HOSTS im->users that would never be
released (in the case of bonding calling the function out of the blue)?
In looking at it, the ip_mc_rejoin_group function (the new one
added with the patch) is a lot more like igmp_group_added() than
ip_mc_up(). I'm not sure if the extra bits in igmp_group_added() are
worthy of concern; I'm thinking not, since im->loaded shouldn't be zero
coming in for the bonding case.
I think the meat that the "rejoin" wants is what's in
igmpv3_send_cr(), which appears to do the actual sending stuff. I'm not
sure if that's better to call directly (and risk locking adventures) or
to just trip the timer via igmp_ifc_event().
Anyway, it looks like all of this needs to be done under RTNL,
which isn't the case, so I need to go off and look into reworking it
again.
Andy: do you have any work in progress on the sleep / rtnl stuff
we've been discussing?
>Also, real interfaces already do gratuitous IGMP advertisements when
>they are bounced (the reason there is an ip_mc_up()). Could bonding,
>when failing over, simply mark the master interface as down, switch, and
>then mark the master as up again? In addition to doing the right
>thing for both IPv4 and IPv6 multicasting w/o any code changes in those
>layers, it may have similar benefits for ARP and neighbor discovery,
>right?
Marking the master down would, I believe, issue notifiers that
the device has gone down. Various things, network manager sort of
applications in particular, listen to those, so I'm not sure it's a good
idea. I think there are other side effects as well, I'm thinking it
would flush routes associated with the interface as well.
-J
---
-Jay Vosburgh, IBM Linux Technology Center, fubar@us.ibm.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-06 23:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-01 1:03 [PATCH 3/3] bonding: Improve IGMP join processing Jay Vosburgh
2007-03-01 16:49 ` Andy Gospodarek
2007-03-01 17:05 ` Jay Vosburgh
2007-03-01 19:25 ` Brian Haley
2007-03-01 19:43 ` Andy Gospodarek
2007-03-01 21:58 ` Jay Vosburgh
2007-03-06 19:55 ` Brian Haley
2007-03-06 20:39 ` Jay Vosburgh
2007-03-06 20:44 ` Andy Gospodarek
2007-03-06 22:32 ` David Stevens
2007-03-06 23:15 ` Jay Vosburgh [this message]
2007-03-07 0:45 ` [Bonding-devel] " David Stevens
2007-03-07 1:50 ` Andy Gospodarek
2007-03-07 3:21 ` David Stevens
2007-03-09 16:53 ` Andy Gospodarek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=11176.1173222941@death \
--to=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
--cc=bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=brian.haley@hp.com \
--cc=dlstevens@us.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.