From: Steve Rotolo <steve.rotolo@ccur.com>
To: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
Cc: joe.korty@ccur.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bugsy@ccur.com
Subject: Re: SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER breaks scheduler fairness
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 11:48:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1117727326.1436.73.camel@whiz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200506022334.31430.kernel@kolivas.org>
On Thu, 2005-06-02 at 09:34, Con Kolivas wrote:
> Funny you should mention this. Check the latest -mm code and you'll see Andrew
> has merged my smp nice code which takes into account "nice" values and alters
> balancing according to nice values and heavily biases them when real time
> tasks are running. So you are correct, and it is a problem common to any
> per-cpu runqueue designed scheduler (which interestingly there is evidence
> that windows went to in about 2003 because it exhibited this very problem).
> However my code should make this behave better now.
>
Glad to hear this is in --mm! And BTW, your patch works great with my
HT test case. Thanks -- good job.
--
Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-02 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-31 17:46 SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER breaks scheduler fairness Steve Rotolo
2005-06-01 2:49 ` Con Kolivas
2005-06-01 14:29 ` Steve Rotolo
2005-06-01 14:47 ` Con Kolivas
2005-06-01 18:41 ` Steve Rotolo
2005-06-01 21:37 ` Con Kolivas
2005-06-01 21:54 ` Con Kolivas
2005-06-01 22:01 ` Steve Rotolo
2005-06-02 3:01 ` Con Kolivas
2005-06-01 23:16 ` Joe Korty
2005-06-01 23:25 ` Con Kolivas
2005-06-02 13:30 ` Steve Rotolo
2005-06-02 13:34 ` Con Kolivas
2005-06-02 15:48 ` Steve Rotolo [this message]
2005-06-03 0:43 ` [PATCH] SCHED: run SCHED_NORMAL tasks with real time tasks on SMT siblings Con Kolivas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1117727326.1436.73.camel@whiz \
--to=steve.rotolo@ccur.com \
--cc=bugsy@ccur.com \
--cc=joe.korty@ccur.com \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.