RE: bitkeeper gone in 2 weeks - which RCS?

[Paul Larson <plars@linuxtestproject.org>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1511 bytes --]

On Wed, 2005-06-15 at 22:35 +0100, Ian Pratt wrote:
> BTW: We now run our own bkd because bkbits.net hasn't been very reliable
> recently. the unstable tree is available as
> bk://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-unstable.bk 
> If you don't want to use bk, the open source bk-client and sourcepuller
> both work fine against it. I expect we'll continue to mirror stuff
> through to BK regardless.
> 
> Hopefully we'll get a hg mirror on xenbits.xensource.com soon as well.

Since it looks like things are leaning more towards mercurial at the
moment, I decided to check it out.  I hadn't previously paid much
attention to it since I could see that any projects were making use of
it and thought it was just too early in development to be practical.  I
have to admit I was very impressed with several aspects of it, but it
does seem to be lacking in a number of areas as well.  

I don't know if this feature is important to anyone but me, but hg
currently doesn't allow you to pull a specific revision, making testing
back through versions to find the point where something broke very
difficult:
-----------------------
>* Paul Larson <plars at linuxtestproject.org> [20050620 20:14]:
> >Is there currently a way to pull a specific revision?  If not, is this
> >feature planned to be available soon?

>It is planned, but I think there is no schedule for implementation
>yet.
-----------------------

-- 
Thanks,
Paul Larson
plars@linuxtestproject.org
http://www.linuxtestproject.org

[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 138 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel