From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Larson Subject: RE: bitkeeper gone in 2 weeks - which RCS? Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 15:39:56 -0500 Message-ID: <1119299996.5380.24.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0643945356==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Mime-version: 1.0 Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ian Pratt Cc: xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org --===============0643945356== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-MJsREXxZu5hQ8gJn5H5q" --=-MJsREXxZu5hQ8gJn5H5q Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2005-06-15 at 22:35 +0100, Ian Pratt wrote: > BTW: We now run our own bkd because bkbits.net hasn't been very reliable > recently. the unstable tree is available as > bk://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-unstable.bk=20 > If you don't want to use bk, the open source bk-client and sourcepuller > both work fine against it. I expect we'll continue to mirror stuff > through to BK regardless. >=20 > Hopefully we'll get a hg mirror on xenbits.xensource.com soon as well. Since it looks like things are leaning more towards mercurial at the moment, I decided to check it out. I hadn't previously paid much attention to it since I could see that any projects were making use of it and thought it was just too early in development to be practical. I have to admit I was very impressed with several aspects of it, but it does seem to be lacking in a number of areas as well. =20 I don't know if this feature is important to anyone but me, but hg currently doesn't allow you to pull a specific revision, making testing back through versions to find the point where something broke very difficult: ----------------------- >* Paul Larson [20050620 20:14]: > >Is there currently a way to pull a specific revision? If not, is this > >feature planned to be available soon? >It is planned, but I think there is no schedule for implementation >yet. ----------------------- --=20 Thanks, Paul Larson plars@linuxtestproject.org http://www.linuxtestproject.org --=-MJsREXxZu5hQ8gJn5H5q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCtymbbkpggQiFDqcRAiH+AJ93RkBfGRJSuFkqOcdI/8a2w1cBrACeNz2j eNheUODqf/ymW4HZyvYPjw0= =Fxha -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-MJsREXxZu5hQ8gJn5H5q-- --===============0643945356== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel --===============0643945356==--