From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S261992AbVFUIey@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S261992AbVFUIey (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Tue, 21 Jun 2005 04:34:54 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262081AbVFUIb0
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Tue, 21 Jun 2005 04:31:26 -0400
Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:10639 "EHLO
	pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S261332AbVFUITK (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 21 Jun 2005 04:19:10 -0400
Subject: Re: Why 2.6.11 has 4 number naming convention?
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: colin <colin@realtek.com.tw>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <004c01c5762d$7938d220$106215ac@realtek.com.tw>
References: <004c01c5762d$7938d220$106215ac@realtek.com.tw>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 09:18:50 +0100
Message-Id: <1119341931.3744.10.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 (2.2.2-5) 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from <dwmw2@infradead.org> by pentafluge.infradead.org
	See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 14:50 +0800, colin wrote:
> Hi all,
> Why 2.6.11 has 4 number naming convention?
> Can you summary it?

http://www.google.com/search?q=2.6.11.1+release

-- 
dwmw2