All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Unknown <netfilter-devel@demultiplexer.de>
To: "Gary W. Smith" <gary@primeexalia.com>
Cc: nf-devel <netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: RE: auto ip configuration
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 23:02:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1119474156.7825.29.camel@notbock> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57F9959B46E0FA4D8BA88AEDFBE582909EB2@pxtbenexd01.pxt.primeexalia.com>

hi Gary,

i heard about DHCP, but a lot of people out there does not.
they haven't any idea of ip. They admins configured they computers
not to use dhcp but STATIC ip configuration.
In such a case it would be nice to have a feature like described below.

regards
jaroslaw

Am Mittwoch, den 22.06.2005, 13:55 -0700 schrieb Gary W. Smith:
> Longshot but I think that it's called DHCP.  Otherwise you would have to change something somewhere each time you plug up your laptop.
>  
> Gary
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org on behalf of Unknown
> Sent: Wed 6/22/2005 1:53 PM
> To: nf-devel
> Subject: auto ip configuration
> 
> 
> 
> dear list,
> 
> you know about people, which have some static ip configuration on their
> notebooks. they would like to connect to a smart gateway
> without the need to change anything.
> 
> I would ask you whether this is possible to implement such a gateway
> using netfilter.
> 
> I alredy build a working example with some tools and scripting
> but it isn't really performant and it have a lot of "design errors".
> Simple speaking it is a farpd running box, where all incoming requests
> are logged through the bridging code. The Syslog output is piped
> into a script and the requested ip is assigned to the lan interface.
> Evil thing ;-)
> 
> I would preffer something like inverse SNAT/MASQUERADE.
> The difference would be, that:
>         it applys to PREROUTING
>         it does mapping from a big subnet (maybe 0/0) to a singe address or a
> range of addresses.
> 
> The farpd would point all clients to the gateway.
> Having rp_filter disabled all misconfigured packets incoming on a lan
> interface would be translated into a valid ip address.
> Then the usual routing would take place.
> The response packets would be back-natted into the clients idea of the
> gateway address.
> 
> Would please someone give me a pointer.
> Am I completly wrong with this?
> 
> regards
> jaroslaw
> 
> 
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2005-06-22 21:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-06-22 20:55 auto ip configuration Gary W. Smith
2005-06-22 21:02 ` Unknown [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-06-22 20:53 Unknown
2005-06-23 13:16 ` Unknown
2003-06-10  1:25 Auto IP configuration Wei Ming Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1119474156.7825.29.camel@notbock \
    --to=netfilter-devel@demultiplexer.de \
    --cc=gary@primeexalia.com \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.