From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bdameron@pivotlink.com Subject: Re: More tales of horror from the linux (HW) raid crypt Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 17:25:50 -0700 Message-ID: <1119486350.42ba018edc4b8@mail.pivotlink.com> References: <5d96567b05061804477325d743@mail.gmail.com> <200506221443.28613.hjm@tacgi.com> <1119477636.5501.161.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200506221545.05840.hjm@tacgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200506221545.05840.hjm@tacgi.com> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids I read this article some time ago. Note that they were testing the older Areca card with it's first firmware version. The new PCIe card has twice the CPU power and has worked out their initial bugs. The performance is enourmously improved. However the price is quit a lot higher than most. Brad Dameron SeaTab Software www.seatab.com Quoting Harry Mangalam : > Also a good point - I was just discussing this in another thread. > Areca makes a number of SATA RAID controllers - some are SCSI-SATA, some are > > PCI-X-SATA, some are PCIe-SATA. > > Areca supplied this URL to a relatively long review of recent SATA and SCSI > controllers - it's worth a read. And surprisingly, the SATA controllers do > pretty well against the SCSI controllers. > > http://www.tweakers.net/reviews/557/1 > > hjm > > On Wednesday 22 June 2005 3:00 pm, Ming Zhang wrote: > > will this 24 port card itself will be a bottleneck? > > > > ming > > > > -- > Cheers, Harry > Harry J Mangalam - 949 856 2847 (vox; email for fax) - hjm@tacgi.com > <> > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >