From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Zan Lynx Subject: Re: reiser4 plugins Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 19:00:58 -0600 Message-ID: <1119920458.19945.15.camel@localhost> References: <42BB7B32.4010100@slaphack.com> <200506240334.j5O3YowB008100@laptop11.inf.utfsm.cl> <20050627092138.GD11013@nysv.org> <20050627124255.GB6280@thunk.org> <42C0578F.7030608@namesys.com> <42C05F16.5000804@xfs.org> <20050627202841.GA27805@thunk.org> <42C06873.7020102@xfs.org> <42C0868E.4080003@punnoor.de> <42C09C91.6000901@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-NYzrJMqwkcOfCSusKu0K" Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <42C09C91.6000901@namesys.com> List-Id: To: Hans Reiser Cc: Prakash Punnoor , Steve Lord , Theodore Ts'o , Markus T?rnqvist , Horst von Brand , David Masover , Alan Cox , Jeff Garzik , Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , ReiserFS List --=-NYzrJMqwkcOfCSusKu0K Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 17:40 -0700, Hans Reiser wrote: > Prakash Punnoor wrote: >=20 > > > >. But nevertheless it didn't survive, as like V3, with time V4 became > >slower and slower. In this case no year was needed, but just one month o= r > >alike. So end of test...but in fact I'll give V4 another go in the near = future. > > =20 > > > Interesting that it got slower with time. It sounds like our online > repacker is much needed. It will be a priority for after the kernel merg= e. I told y'all that last year on the reiserfs-list, with benchmarks :-) --=20 Zan Lynx --=-NYzrJMqwkcOfCSusKu0K Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCwKFKG8fHaOLTWwgRArJpAJ4pV26PbRXZsttG4PS4l6WoVsKiSwCgkuxu XqKAsD9dyBZWfMwlQnGK7MA= =cgkd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-NYzrJMqwkcOfCSusKu0K--