From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Avi Kivity <avi.kivity@qumranet.com>
Subject: Re: suspending execution within Xen
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 16:49:20 +0300
Message-ID: <1120052961.12491.11.camel@blast.q>
References: <1120045998.12491.10.camel@blast.q>
	<2b16fd68e7b025242a843b31ba8e0701@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <2b16fd68e7b025242a843b31ba8e0701@cl.cam.ac.uk>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 13:42 +0100, Keir Fraser wrote:
> Xen on x86 doesn't support stack-based continuations within the 
> hypervisor -- that is, there is no way to deschedule the current domain 
> within Xen and then automatically return to your current point of 
> execution when you are re-scheduled.
> 
> If you have further work to do, before returning to guest context, when 
> the domain is rescheduled then you need to install your own hook 
> function into vcpu->arch.schedule_tail. You'll need to xmalloc any 
> space you need for continuation data.
> 

this will probably serve. thanks.


>   -- Keir
> 
> On 29 Jun 2005, at 12:53, Avi Kivity wrote:
> 
> > I am trying to send a stream of events about one domain to another. so 
> > I
> > set up a ring between the monitoring domain and xen (not the monitored
> > domain). however I am having trouble blocking when buffer space runs
> > out.
> >
> > the intuitive
> >
> >    while (!buffer_space_available())
> >        do_block();
> >
> > does not work; do_block() appears to return to guest context, not to 
> > the
> > while loop (is this correct?). the other alternative,
> >
> >     while (!buffer_space_available())
> > 	if (!test_and_set_bit(EDF_BLOCKED, &ed->ed_flags))
> > 	    domain_sleep(ed);
> >
> > freezes xen solid.
> >
> > is there a way to do it? am I missing something obvious?
> >
> > Avi
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-devel mailing list
> > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>