From: Ming Zhang <mingz@ele.uri.edu>
To: Mark Hahn <hahn@physics.mcmaster.ca>
Cc: 'Linux RAID' <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: raid0 low performance
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 09:19:47 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1120569587.5535.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1120523217.5459.20.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Hi,
With this
-[00]-+-00.0 8086:2578
+-03.0-[01]----01.0 8086:1075
+-1c.0-[02]--+-01.0 11ab:5081
| +-03.0 9005:00c0
| +-03.1 9005:00c0
| \-04.0 11ab:5041
+-1e.0-[03]--+-09.0 1002:4752
| \-0a.0 8086:1076
+-1f.0 8086:25a1
+-1f.1 8086:25a2
+-1f.2 8086:25a3
\-1f.3 8086:25a4
i tried to tune the latency-timer on 02:01.0 02:04.0 and 00:1c.0
individually or both. tried 40, 60, 80. no luck.
so i think it is the driver or card fault. :) thanks anyway.
ming
On Mon, 2005-07-04 at 20:26 -0400, Ming Zhang wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-07-04 at 20:13 -0400, Mark Hahn wrote:
> > > # ./lspci -vv -d 11ab:
> > > 02:01.0 Class 0100: 11ab:5081 (rev 03)
> > > Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV+ VGASnoop-
> > > ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B-
> > > Status: Cap+ 66Mhz+ UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort-
> > > <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR-
> > > Latency: 32, cache line size 08
> >
> > latency 32 is quite low; this parameter effects how long the device
> > can hold onto the bus. try
> > setpci -s 02:01.0 latency_timer=80
>
> thanks a lot for this and i will test it tomorrow.
>
> > and see whether it improves things. I'm unclear on whether a bridged device
> > also needs the bridge's latency setting changed.
> >
> > > Latency: 32, cache line size 08
> >
> > also low. I'm guessing that your bios is tuned for desktop use - some audio
> > setups need low latency settings.
> >
> yes, i guess so, the only drawback of this box is that i am using a
> entry level server box. so its chipset is quite weak and the setting i
> left as default.
>
>
> Ming
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-05 13:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-01 2:15 raid0 low performance Ming Zhang
2005-07-01 2:28 ` Tyler
2005-07-01 2:57 ` John Madden
2005-07-01 12:41 ` Ming Zhang
2005-07-01 12:54 ` John Madden
2005-07-01 13:10 ` Ming Zhang
2005-07-01 12:32 ` Ming Zhang
2005-07-01 12:55 ` Guy
2005-07-01 13:17 ` Ming Zhang
2005-07-01 13:54 ` Ming Zhang
2005-07-05 0:13 ` Mark Hahn
2005-07-05 0:26 ` Ming Zhang
2005-07-05 13:19 ` Ming Zhang [this message]
2005-07-01 14:42 ` Ming Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1120569587.5535.7.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=mingz@ele.uri.edu \
--cc=hahn@physics.mcmaster.ca \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.