From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261985AbVGKPZr (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jul 2005 11:25:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261971AbVGKPXn (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jul 2005 11:23:43 -0400 Received: from clock-tower.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:60109 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261996AbVGKPXc (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jul 2005 11:23:32 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC] Atmel-supplied hardware headers for AT91RM9200 SoC processor From: Alan Cox To: Andrew Victor Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Christoph Hellwig , Russell King , dwmw2@infradead.org In-Reply-To: <1121090246.7380.46.camel@fuzzie.sanpeople.com> References: <1120730318.16806.75.camel@fuzzie.sanpeople.com> <20050707130607.GC28489@infradead.org> <1121088922.7407.64.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1121090246.7380.46.camel@fuzzie.sanpeople.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1121095209.7433.74.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 16:20:11 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Llu, 2005-07-11 at 14:57, Andrew Victor wrote: > The issue that everybody seems to be forgetting (or ignoring) with > changing the headers is that ALL the drivers then also need to be > converted, and re-tested. So its a few more lines of perl > I have asked Atmel if they're willing to dual-license the headers. The > licensing issue is probably now with their legal department, but I don't > see them having a problem with it. Great