From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jerone Young Subject: Re: [PATCH] make shadow code compile ok on FC4 which is using gcc4 Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 15:11:49 -0500 Message-ID: <1121112710.8028.16.camel@thinkpad> References: <16A54BF5D6E14E4D916CE26C9AD30575029F0BB7@pdsmsx402.ccr.corp.intel.com> <42D2C65E.5000601@blueyonder.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Keir Fraser Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 20:58 +0100, Keir Fraser wrote: > On 11 Jul 2005, at 20:19, David Hopwood wrote: > > >> We need this patch to make shadow code compile ok on FC4 which is > >> using > >> gcc4. > > > > Given gcc4's propensity to warn about things that are often harmless, > > is it > > still a good idea to be compiling with -Werror? > > It's been slightly annoying but not too much of a pain to keep things > working with gcc4, and using -Werror does mean that genuine warnings > don't get lost in the noise. > > Anyway, we have more serious problems with gcc4 (I can't boot dom0 as > far as a login prompt when I build xen+xenlinux with gcc4). Currently > gcc 3.2.x and 3.3.x are the main supported compilers. That's odd. I'm booting and running xen+xenlinux fine with gcc4 under FC4...with the 2.6.12 patch ...under x86-64 no less. > > -- Keir > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel > -- Jerone Young IBM Linux Technology Center jyoung5@us.ibm.com 512-838-1157 (T/L: 678-1157)