From: Ming Zhang <mingz@ele.uri.edu>
To: Holger Kiehl <Holger.Kiehl@dwd.de>
Cc: Dan Christensen <jdc@uwo.ca>, Linux RAID <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RAID-5 streaming read performance
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 08:29:43 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1121430583.5548.11.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0507150558330.10696@praktifix.dwd.de>
in my previous test, using SATA, i got better result in 2.6 instead of
2.4. :P
Ming
On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 06:01 +0000, Holger Kiehl wrote:
> > I'm trying to figure out why the last two numbers differ.
> >
> Have you checked what the performance with a 2.4.x kernel is? If I
> remember correctly there was some discussion on this list that 2.4
> raid5
> has better read performance.
>
> Holger
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-15 12:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-11 15:11 RAID-5 streaming read performance Dan Christensen
2005-07-13 2:08 ` Ming Zhang
2005-07-13 2:52 ` Dan Christensen
2005-07-13 3:15 ` berk walker
2005-07-13 12:24 ` Ming Zhang
2005-07-13 12:48 ` Dan Christensen
2005-07-13 12:52 ` Ming Zhang
2005-07-13 14:23 ` Dan Christensen
2005-07-13 14:29 ` Ming Zhang
2005-07-13 17:56 ` Dan Christensen
2005-07-13 22:38 ` Neil Brown
2005-07-14 0:09 ` Ming Zhang
2005-07-14 1:16 ` Neil Brown
2005-07-14 1:25 ` Ming Zhang
2005-07-13 18:02 ` David Greaves
2005-07-13 18:14 ` Ming Zhang
2005-07-13 21:18 ` David Greaves
2005-07-13 21:44 ` Ming Zhang
2005-07-13 21:50 ` David Greaves
2005-07-13 21:55 ` Ming Zhang
2005-07-13 22:52 ` Neil Brown
2005-07-14 3:58 ` Dan Christensen
2005-07-14 4:13 ` Mark Hahn
2005-07-14 21:16 ` Dan Christensen
2005-07-14 21:30 ` Ming Zhang
2005-07-14 23:29 ` Mark Hahn
2005-07-15 1:23 ` Ming Zhang
2005-07-15 2:11 ` Dan Christensen
2005-07-15 12:28 ` Ming Zhang
2005-07-14 12:30 ` Ming Zhang
2005-07-14 14:23 ` Ming Zhang
2005-07-14 17:54 ` Dan Christensen
2005-07-14 18:00 ` Ming Zhang
2005-07-14 18:03 ` Dan Christensen
2005-07-14 18:10 ` Ming Zhang
2005-07-14 19:16 ` Dan Christensen
2005-07-14 20:13 ` Ming Zhang
2005-07-15 2:38 ` Dan Christensen
2005-07-15 6:01 ` Holger Kiehl
2005-07-15 12:29 ` Ming Zhang [this message]
2005-07-13 22:42 ` Neil Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1121430583.5548.11.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=mingz@ele.uri.edu \
--cc=Holger.Kiehl@dwd.de \
--cc=jdc@uwo.ca \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.