From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jerone Young Subject: RE: HG question Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 11:32:42 -0500 Message-ID: <1121445163.3036.7.camel@thinkpad> References: <7F740D512C7C1046AB53446D37200173048F31C2@scsmsx402.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <7F740D512C7C1046AB53446D37200173048F31C2@scsmsx402.amr.corp.intel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: "Nakajima, Jun" Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Well we had an issue with our blades where the bios disabled the ability for the CPU to interpert NX bit. We should have a check to see if the NX bit is supported & remove it from pages if it's not. I'll get a patch to the list on this. On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 09:07 -0700, Nakajima, Jun wrote: > BTW, the current x86_64 xenlinux requires the CPUs to support NX/XD. > It's basically a bug, but the priority is low at this point because only > very early stepping of x86_64 CPUs don't support NX/XD as far as I know. > > Keir Fraser wrote: > > On 15 Jul 2005, at 16:31, Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh wrote: > > > >> Is there any way to find out using mercurial if a certain patch was > >> applied to the unstable tree or not? For example what command should > >> I use to find out if "[PATCH] Restoring NX/XD for x86_64 xenlinux" > >> made it into the tree or not? > > > > hg -v history | grep "Restoring NX" > > > > -- Keir > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Xen-devel mailing list > > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel > > Jun > --- > Intel Open Source Technology Center > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel > -- Jerone Young IBM Linux Technology Center jyoung5@us.ibm.com 512-838-1157 (T/L: 678-1157)