From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Tom 'spot' Callaway" Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 20:43:31 +0000 Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] sparc: remove the useless APM_RTC_IS_GMT option Message-Id: <1121460211.2755.114.camel@localhost.localdomain> List-Id: References: <20050715203632.GD18059@stusta.de> In-Reply-To: <20050715203632.GD18059@stusta.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Adrian Bunk Cc: Andrew Morton , wli@holomorphy.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 22:36 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > I can't see any effect of this option outside the i386-specific APM > code. Doesn't the Javastation potentially use this? ~spot -- Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Senior Sales Engineer || GPG ID: 93054260 Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices) Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my! From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263364AbVGOUoS (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jul 2005 16:44:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263360AbVGOUoN (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jul 2005 16:44:13 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:662 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263368AbVGOUnv (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jul 2005 16:43:51 -0400 Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] sparc: remove the useless APM_RTC_IS_GMT option From: "Tom 'spot' Callaway" To: Adrian Bunk Cc: Andrew Morton , wli@holomorphy.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20050715203632.GD18059@stusta.de> References: <20050715203632.GD18059@stusta.de> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Red Hat Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 15:43:31 -0500 Message-Id: <1121460211.2755.114.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 (2.2.2-8) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 22:36 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > I can't see any effect of this option outside the i386-specific APM > code. Doesn't the Javastation potentially use this? ~spot -- Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Senior Sales Engineer || GPG ID: 93054260 Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices) Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my!