From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Alejandro Bonilla <abonilla@linuxwireless.org>,
Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: Giving developers clue how many testers verified certain kernel version
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 12:45:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1122137127.15281.3.camel@mindpipe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200507231905.26241.kernel@kolivas.org>
On Sat, 2005-07-23 at 19:05 +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
> Indeed, and the purpose of the benchmark is to quantify something rather than
> leave it to subjective feeling. Fortunately if I was to quantify the current
> kernel's situation I would say everything is fine.
Agreed. Unfortunately everything in userspace is not fine. I think a
lot of these interactivity problems are due to X and broken/bloated
apps.
Lee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-23 16:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-23 0:44 Giving developers clue how many testers verified certain kernel version Blaisorblade
2005-07-23 0:50 ` David Lang
2005-07-23 0:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-07-23 1:07 ` Alejandro Bonilla
2005-07-23 3:09 ` Lee Revell
2005-07-23 2:15 ` Alejandro Bonilla
2005-07-23 3:21 ` Lee Revell
2005-07-23 2:34 ` Alejandro Bonilla
2005-07-23 3:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-07-23 2:40 ` Alejandro Bonilla
2005-07-23 3:34 ` Lee Revell
2005-07-23 9:05 ` Con Kolivas
2005-07-23 16:45 ` Lee Revell [this message]
2005-07-23 5:34 ` Giving developers clue how many testers verifiedcertain " Al Boldi
2005-07-23 3:56 ` Giving developers clue how many testers verified certain " Adrian Bunk
2005-07-23 9:21 ` Jesper Krogh
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-07-22 1:34 Martin MOKREJŠ
2005-07-22 2:10 ` Mark Nipper
2005-07-22 2:38 ` Martin MOKREJŠ
2005-07-22 2:40 ` Alejandro Bonilla
2005-07-22 23:22 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-07-22 23:11 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-07-24 18:45 ` Martin MOKREJŠ
2005-07-24 18:54 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-07-24 19:10 ` Martin MOKREJŠ
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1122137127.15281.3.camel@mindpipe \
--to=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=abonilla@linuxwireless.org \
--cc=blaisorblade@yahoo.it \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.