From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261521AbVGZAUl (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:20:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261543AbVGZAUl (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:20:41 -0400 Received: from ms-smtp-04.nyroc.rr.com ([24.24.2.58]:18101 "EHLO ms-smtp-04.nyroc.rr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261521AbVGZAUj (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:20:39 -0400 Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.13-rc3] i386: clean up user_mode macros From: Steven Rostedt To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Andi Kleen , Vincent Hanquez , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel , Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com> In-Reply-To: References: <200507251901_MC3-1-A589-A433@compuserve.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Kihon Technologies Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:20:12 -0400 Message-Id: <1122337212.4895.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2005-07-25 at 16:13 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > I _really_ prefer > > x != 0 > > over > > !!x Good to hear. This means that you should have no problem accepting my previous patch for signal.c that changed the x ^ y to x != y. And I would also assume that you prefer x *= 2 over x <<= 1 (also since the first person to show this example used x <<= 2. Right Lee? :-) -- Steve