Re: [PATCH] use bus_slot number for name

[Kristen Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@intel.com>]

On Fri, 2005-08-05 at 15:51 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 12:16:06PM -0700, Kristen Accardi wrote:
>  > For systems with multiple hotplug controllers, you need to use more than
>  > just the slot number to uniquely name the slot.  Without a unique slot
>  > name, the pci_hp_register() will fail.  This patch adds the bus number
>  > to the name.
>  > 
>  > Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@intel.com>
>  > 
>  > diff -uprN -X linux-2.6.13-rc4/Documentation/dontdiff linux-2.6.13-rc4/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp.h linux-2.6.13-rc4-shpchp-slot-name-fix/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp.h
>  > --- linux-2.6.13-rc4/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp.h	2005-07-28 15:44:44.000000000 -0700
>  > +++ linux-2.6.13-rc4-shpchp-slot-name-fix/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp.h	2005-08-04 17:57:18.000000000 -0700
>  > @@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ static inline void return_resource(struc
>  >  
>  >  static inline void make_slot_name(char *buffer, int buffer_size, struct slot *slot)
>  >  {
>  > -	snprintf(buffer, buffer_size, "%d", slot->number);
>  > +	snprintf(buffer, buffer_size, "%04d_%04d", slot->bus, slot->number);
>  >  }
> 
> Won't using..
> 
> 	snprintf(buffer, buffer_size, "%s", pci_name(slot));
> 
> work equally as well, and also future-proof this ?
>  
> 		Dave

Well, it isn't as convenient since pci_dev is not available from the
slot structure. But I will do it if this is the general consensus.