From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: cpufreq suspend patch.
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 10:32:39 +0200
Message-ID: <1123576360.30257.153.camel@gaston>
References: <20050808224401.GA3277@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org@lists.linux.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20050808224401.GA3277@redhat.com>
List-Id: <cpufreq.vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq>,
	<mailto:cpufreq-request@lists.linux.org.uk?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linux.org.uk/mailman/private/cpufreq>
List-Post: <mailto:cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk>
List-Help: <mailto:cpufreq-request@lists.linux.org.uk?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq>,
	<mailto:cpufreq-request@lists.linux.org.uk?subject=subscribe>
Sender: cpufreq-bounces@lists.linux.org.uk
Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org@lists.linux.org.uk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk, dwmw2@redhat.com

On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 18:44 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> Ben,
>  Dave Woodhouse added this to the Fedora kernel a while back
> with the helpful comment "Fix ppc32 sleep/cpufreq harder"
> I believe this came from you originally.
> 
> Can you comment on this ? 
> 
> It seems to make sense to me,  but if you have a newer patch
> I'm all ears..

Can you compare with what's currently upstream ? (I'm still travelling
around so it's more difficult for me).

Ben.