From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: [PATCH] DEC hsg80 needs BLIST_REPORTLUN2 Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 13:36:12 -0500 Message-ID: <1123612572.5170.35.camel@mulgrave> References: <1123608417.30193.23.camel@aptis101.cqtel.com> <1123609899.5170.32.camel@mulgrave> <1123612144.30193.31.camel@aptis101.cqtel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from stat16.steeleye.com ([209.192.50.48]:56204 "EHLO hancock.sc.steeleye.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964923AbVHISgT (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Aug 2005 14:36:19 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1123612144.30193.31.camel@aptis101.cqtel.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: "Wilcox, Stephen P, CITPC" Cc: linux-scsi mailing list On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 13:29 -0500, Wilcox, Stephen P, CITPC wrote: > Crap. I was afraid that my mailer might mangle this... I created the > patch with "diff -up" based on the info in "SubmittingPatches" in the > kernel source tree, but I must admit that I manually edited the patch so > that It would apply to RedHat's .src.rpms using their canned spec files. > The working (at least using RedHat's method) patch is attached this time > rather than pasted in. If that one still fails to work, the single > change is all that's really needed. Well, apparently your ISP mangles attachments: > The file scsi-blacklist.patch has been replaced, as it is a file type > that is known for spreading viruses. For assistance, please contact > your local Desktop Support Personnel or refer to the following website > for direction. http://antivirus.security.att.com/Default.htm > However I think I have this patch here: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi-misc-2.6.git;a=commit;h=67f4602a392008439ab030ab23181f75e330ba74 If you just verify I got it right. James