From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751293AbVHLVyQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Aug 2005 17:54:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751297AbVHLVyP (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Aug 2005 17:54:15 -0400 Received: from ms-smtp-04.nyroc.rr.com ([24.24.2.58]:21182 "EHLO ms-smtp-04.nyroc.rr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751293AbVHLVyP (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Aug 2005 17:54:15 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix PPC signal handling of NODEFER, should not affect sa_mask From: Steven Rostedt To: Jesper Juhl Cc: Chris Wright , Jan Engelhardt , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Bodo Stroesser , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Robert Wilkens In-Reply-To: <9a87484905081212317ca8c04e@mail.gmail.com> References: <1123615983.18332.194.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1123618745.18332.204.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050809204928.GH7991@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> <1123621223.9553.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1123621637.9553.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1123643401.9553.32.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050812184503.GX7762@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> <9a87484905081212317ca8c04e@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Kihon Technologies Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 17:53:53 -0400 Message-Id: <1123883633.5296.26.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Two more systems that are different from Linux. So far, Linux is the odd ball out. -- Steve On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 22:28 +0100, someone else wrote: > > SunOS hostname 5.10 Generic sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Blade-1000 > > sa_mask blocks other signals > SA_NODEFER does not block other signals > SA_NODEFER does not affect sa_mask > SA_NODEFER and sa_mask blocks sig > !SA_NODEFER blocks sig > SA_NODEFER does not block sig > sa_mask blocks sig > > > OSF1 hostname V5.1 2650 alpha > > sa_mask blocks other signals > SA_NODEFER does not block other signals > SA_NODEFER does not affect sa_mask > SA_NODEFER and sa_mask blocks sig > !SA_NODEFER blocks sig > SA_NODEFER does not block sig > sa_mask blocks sig > >