From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Drake <dsd@gentoo.org>, CaT <cat@zip.com.au>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: IT8212/ITE RAID
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 22:13:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1124054033.26937.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <58cb370e050814085613ccc42c@mail.gmail.com>
On Sul, 2005-08-14 at 17:56 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> * your stuff was accepted after all (and some stuff like ide-cd
> fixes was never splitted from the -ac patchset and submitted)
They were.
> * you've never provided any technical details on "the stuff I broke"
I did, several times. I had some detailed locking discussions with
Manfred and others on it as a result. The locking in the base IDE is
still broken, in fact its become worse - the random locking around
timing changes now causes some PIIX users to see double spinlock debug
with the base kernel as an example.
> > Would make sense, but I thought I had the right bits masked. Will take a
>
> WIN_RESTORE is send unconditionally (as it always was),
>
> This is not the right thing, somebody should go over all ATA/ATAPI
> drafts and come with the correct strategy of handling WIN_RESTORE.
Ok that would make sense. Matthew Garrett also reported some problems in
that area with suspend/resume (BIOS restoring its idea of things...)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-14 20:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-14 5:30 IT8212/ITE RAID CaT
2005-08-14 11:08 ` Daniel Drake
2005-08-14 11:47 ` CaT
2005-08-14 12:44 ` Daniel Drake
2005-08-14 13:33 ` Alan Cox
2005-08-14 15:01 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-08-14 15:52 ` Alan Cox
2005-08-14 15:56 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-08-14 21:13 ` Alan Cox [this message]
2005-08-14 21:20 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-08-22 9:28 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-08-22 10:33 ` Alan Cox
2005-08-22 10:21 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-08-22 23:48 ` Andre Hedrick
2005-08-14 23:59 ` CaT
2005-08-16 22:41 ` CaT
2005-08-14 21:09 ` James Tabor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1124054033.26937.3.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=cat@zip.com.au \
--cc=dsd@gentoo.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.