All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Petr Vandrovec" <VANDROVE@vc.cvut.cz>
To: Patrick Mochel <mochel@osdl.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] read() from driverfs files can read more bytes
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 18:25:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <11240BA04440@vcnet.vc.cvut.cz> (raw)

On  7 Feb 02 at 8:45, Patrick Mochel wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Andrey Panin wrote:
> > Attached patch adds check that returned value is less then requested 
> > byte count. I know that actual callback function device_read_status()
> > should also be fixed, but I found this bug after midnight and 
> > decided to sleep a little :)
> 
> That sanity check was in there, once upon a time. However, in moving the 
> weight from the driver callbacks to the driverfs read_file() and 
> write_file(), it must have got dropped...
> 
> Thank you. It's been applied and will be pushed forward.

[I have only 2.5.3 sources here yet]

Can you also check for size >= PAGE_SIZE on enter to entry->show()
procedure? It looks ugly to me that each driver has to check for this
constant unless it wants to smash some innocent kernel memory.

And neither of driverfs_read_file nor driverfs_write_file supports
semantic we use with other filesystems: If at least one byte was 
read/written, return byte count (even if error happens). Only if zero 
bytes was written, return error code.
                                Thanks,
                                            Petr Vandrovec
                                            vandrove@vc.cvut.cz


             reply	other threads:[~2002-02-07 17:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-02-07 17:25 Petr Vandrovec [this message]
2002-02-07 17:43 ` [PATCH] read() from driverfs files can read more bytes Patrick Mochel
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-02-07 18:11 Thomas Hood
2002-02-07 18:15 Petr Vandrovec
2002-02-07 18:27 ` Patrick Mochel
2002-02-08 19:18   ` Pavel Machek
2002-02-07 20:11 Petr Vandrovec
2002-02-07 20:21 ` Patrick Mochel
2002-02-07 20:26   ` Alexander Viro
2002-02-07 20:59     ` Patrick Mochel
2002-02-07 21:37       ` Alexander Viro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=11240BA04440@vcnet.vc.cvut.cz \
    --to=vandrove@vc.cvut.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mochel@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.