From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com>
Cc: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>,
Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Schedulers benchmark - Was: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 23:28:47 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1124422128.25424.7.camel@mindpipe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6bffcb0e050818200936bad1d3@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 05:09 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi,
> here are interbench v0.29 resoults:
The X test under simulated "Compile" load looks most interesting.
Most of the schedulers do quite poorly on this test - only Zaphod with
default max_ia_bonus and max_tpt_bonus manages to deliver under 100ms
max latency. As expected with interactivity bonus disabled it performs
horribly.
I'd like to see some results with X reniced to -10. Despite what the
2.6 release notes say, this still seems to make a difference.
Lee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-19 3:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-15 4:46 [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6 Peter Williams
2005-08-15 12:29 ` Michal Piotrowski
[not found] ` <43012427.9080406@bigpond.net.au>
[not found] ` <4301330B.3070400@bigpond.net.au>
2005-08-16 12:54 ` Michal Piotrowski
2005-08-17 8:00 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-17 11:23 ` Michal Piotrowski
2005-08-17 12:31 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-16 21:49 ` Schedulers benchmark - Was: " Michal Piotrowski
2005-08-17 8:10 ` Peter Williams
2005-08-17 9:03 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-17 18:04 ` Michal Piotrowski
2005-08-17 21:35 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-17 23:15 ` Peter Williams
2005-08-17 23:16 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-17 23:48 ` Peter Williams
2005-08-17 23:45 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-19 3:09 ` Michal Piotrowski
2005-08-19 3:28 ` Lee Revell [this message]
2005-08-19 3:41 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-19 4:41 ` Peter Williams
2005-08-19 4:36 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-19 20:13 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-20 0:31 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-20 3:04 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-20 18:52 ` Lee Revell
2005-08-19 4:26 ` Peter Williams
2005-08-17 11:59 ` Michal Piotrowski
2005-08-21 1:34 ` Michal Piotrowski
2005-08-21 1:47 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-21 4:16 ` Michal Piotrowski
2005-08-21 4:22 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-21 4:44 ` Michal Piotrowski
2005-08-21 4:49 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-21 1:37 ` Michal Piotrowski
[not found] ` <4309125B.4020707@bigpond.net.au>
2005-08-22 11:39 ` Michal Piotrowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1124422128.25424.7.camel@mindpipe \
--to=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com \
--cc=pwil3058@bigpond.net.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.